Magnetic recording medium and method of producing the same

ABSTRACT

A magnetic recording medium, which comprises: a nonmagnetic support; and a magnetic layer comprising a ferromagnetic powder and a binder, wherein an average surface roughness (Ra) at a center of a surface of the magnetic layer measured by using an atomic force microscope (AFM) is 2 nm or less, the maximum height (Rmax) thereof is 50 nm or less, and an arithmetic average of phase difference between a drive signal and a response signal of a probe measured with the atomic force microscope in a tapping mode is from 2 to 20°, and a method of producing the same.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

This invention relates to a magnetic recording medium and a method ofproducing the same. More specifically, it relates to a magneticrecording medium of the coated type which has smooth surface properties,has small spacing between head and the medium, enables high-densityrecording, shows favorable running performance and causes little headwear, and a method of producing a magnetic recording medium whereby theabove-described characteristics can be established while achieving ahigh productivity.

2. Description of the Related Art

In the field of magnetic recording, recording wavelength becomes shorterwith the recent increases in the recording density. With the tendencytoward using MR heads as reproduction heads, attempts have been made tofinely divide a magnetic material and thus increase the number ofmagnetic particles per unit volume thereby reducing medium noises. Tomagnetically separate magnetic particles, there has been employedhigh-dispersion of a magnetic solution. When a magnetic solution ishigh-dispersed, however, there arises a problem that the exposure ofabrasive particles from a magnetic layer is inhibited or the projectionheight on the magnetic layer surface is lowered and thus the durabilityis worsened.

To solve this problem and establish both of high-density recording andan excellent run durability, there has been proposed a method whereindiamond having an elevated abrasive power and a controlled particle sizeis employed as an abrasive (see JP-A-2000-149243 and JP-A-2003-85734).

JP-A-2000-149243 and JP-A-2003-85734 propose a technique of dispersingdiamond in a magnetic solution by using a sand mill. However, thismethod suffers from a problem that the diamond causes abrasion of mediabeads (for example, glass beads or ZrO₂ beads) or the inner wall (mainlymade of stainless steel) of the disperser in the course of thedispersion and thus abrasion dusts contaminate the magnetic solution.Therefore, both of high-density recording and an excellent rundurability can be hardly established by using the known techniques asdescribed above.

Under these circumstances, the present applicant has proposed a methodof manufacturing a magnetic recording medium which comprises separatelydispersing a magnetic solution which contains the ferromagnetic powderand the binder, and an abrasive solution which contains an abrasive anda solvent, then mixing the magnetic solution and the abrasive solutiontogether, and after that, subjecting the liquid mixture of the magneticsolution with the abrasive solution to a dispersion treatment by theapplication of ultrasonic waves (JP-A-2005-228369).

This production method is useful, since a magnetic recording mediumsuffering from little contamination with foreign matters, havingexcellent run durability and causing little head wear can be obtainedthereby.

To enlarge the recording capacity of a magnetic recording medium, it isrequired to elevate the recording density. For this purpose, attemptshave been made to reduce the particle size of a magnetic material in amagnetic layer and smoothen the surface. Furthermore, there have beenproposed anisotropic magnetoresistive heads (so-called AMR heads) andgiant magnetoresistive heads (so-called GMR heads) having furtherelevated sensitivity.

However, it has been found out that, in the case where the surfaceroughness is extremely elevated by using the technique disclosed inJP-A-2005-228369, there arise troubles such as sticking of a medium to ahead and stripping of a magnetic layer due to sliding with a guide.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Accordingly, an object of the invention is to provide a magneticrecording medium of the coated type which has smooth surface properties,has small spacing between head and the medium, enables high-densityrecording, shows favorable running performance and causes little headwear, and a method of producing a magnetic recording medium whereby theabove-described characteristics can be established while achieving ahigh productivity.

The invention is as follows.

(1) A magnetic recording medium, which comprises:

a nonmagnetic support; and

a magnetic layer comprising a ferromagnetic powder and a binder,

wherein an average surface roughness (Ra) at a center of a surface ofthe magnetic layer measured by using an atomic force microscope (AFM) is2 nm or less, the maximum height (Rmax) thereof is 50 nm or less, and

an arithmetic average of phase difference between a drive signal and aresponse signal of a probe measured with the atomic force microscope ina tapping mode is from 2 to 20°.

(2) The magnetic recording medium as described in (1) above,

wherein the ferromagnetic powder is a hexagonal ferrite powder having anaverage tabular diameter of 30 nm or less.

(3) The magnetic recording medium as described in (1) or (2) above,

wherein the magnetic layer further comprises diamond particles having anaverage particle diameter of 100 nm or less.

(4) A method of producing a magnetic recording medium, the methodcomprising:

separately dispersing a magnetic solution comprising a ferromagneticpowder and a binder, and an abrasive solution comprising an abrasive;then

mixing the magnetic solution with the abrasive solution to give acoating solution for a magnetic layer; and

applying the coating solution on a nonmagnetic support to form amagnetic layer,

wherein a liquid mixture obtained by mixing the magnetic solution withthe abrasive solution is subjected to both of an air-bubbling treatmentand an ultrasonication treatment.

(5) The method as described in (4) above,

wherein the air-bubbling treatment is a treatment that is conducted bystirring with a high-speed stirrer having stirring blades at a stirringblade peripheral speed of 10 m/sec or higher for 5 minutes or longer,and then

the ultrasonication treatment is conducted.

(6) The method as described in (4) or (5) above, which furthercomprises:

dispersing a carbon black solution comprising a carbon black with a beadmill; then

subjecting the obtained dispersion to an air-bubbling treatment followedby an ultrasonication treatment; and then

mixing the dispersion with the magnetic solution and the abrasivesolution to thereby give a coating solution for a magnetic layer.

(7) The magnetic recording medium as described in (3) above,

wherein an amount of the diamond particles is from 0.05 to 5% by massbased on the ferromagnetic powder.

(8) The magnetic recording medium as described in any of (1) to (3) and(7) above,

wherein the arithmetic average of phase difference is from 2 to 10°.

(9) The magnetic recording medium as described in any of (1) to (3), (7)and (8) above,

wherein the average surface roughness (Ra) is from 0.5 to 1.5 nm.

(10) The magnetic recording medium as described in any of (1) to (3) and(7) to (9) above,

wherein the maximum height (Rmax) is from 10 to 50 nm.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Next, the invention will be described in greater detail.

The magnetic layer in the magnetic recording medium of the invention ischaracterized by having an arithmetic average of phase differencedetected under an atomic force microscope of from 2 to 20°. Thisarithmetic average of phase difference is preferably from 2 to 10° andmore preferably from 2 to 6°. The inventor has found out that, in thecase where a magnetic layer having an ultrasmooth surface, which has anaverage surface roughness (Ra) at the center measured by using an AFM of2 nm or less and a maximum height (Rmax) thereof of 50 nm or less,contains a solid additive (an abrasive or carbon black) and hasmicrocavities in the surface layer thereof, troubles such as sticking ofthe medium to a head and stripping of the magnetic layer due to slidingwith a guide can be prevented. The inventor has further found out thatthe mode of the solid additive and microcavities as described abovecorrelates to the arithmetic average of phase difference detected by theatomic force microscope. So long as the arithmetic average of phasedifference falls within the range as specified above, the surface layerof the magnetic layer has the solid additive and the microcavities in anappropriate state and thus troubles such as sticking of a medium to ahead and stripping of a magnetic layer due to sliding with a guide canbe solved. It is desirable that the surface layer of the magnetic layerhas an appropriate amount of a liquid lubricant in addition to the solidadditive and cavities as described above.

In the case where the arithmetic average of phase difference is lessthan 2°, the surface layer of the magnetic layer is mainly made up of alayer comprising a magnetic material and a binder. In this case,therefore, the surface layer has no abrasive, carbon black ormicrocavity. Thus, there arise troubles such as sticking of the mediumto a head and stripping of the magnetic layer due to sliding with aguide. In the case where the arithmetic average of phase differenceexceeds 20°, on the contrary, there arises another problem that thepacking ratio of the magnetic material in the surface layer of themagnetic layer decreases.

The phase difference detected under an atomic force microscope as usedherein can be measured by detecting the phase difference between thedrive signal and the response signal of a probe while monitoring thesurface shape in the tapping mode. Phase difference is determined hereinusing a scanning probe microscope (D3100; manufactured by DigitalInstruments) under the following conditions. In this measurement methodwhich is called “Phase Imaging”, a difference in cohesive force orviscoelasticity is usually indicated as phase difference contrast. Inthe invention, the arithmetic average of phase difference is determinedas in determining the average surface roughness (Ra) at the center fromthe difference in height in the surface shape. Based on the correlationto the AFM surface shape, it is considered that phase data within adepth of 50 nm, within a depth of 20 nm in many cases, from the surfacelayer of the magnetic layer is detected under the following conditions.

Measurement area: 5 μm×5 μm

Tip: diamond needle with a curvature of 10 nm

Scan rate: 1 Hz

Scan angle: 0°

Tip speed: 10 μm/sec

Scan number: 512

Probe frequency: 265 to 269 kHz

Phase: 70°

Output: 1.3 to 2.4 V

Next, each components constituting the magnetic recording medium will beillustrated.

Nonmagnetic Support

As the nonmagnetic support to be used in the invention, use can be madeof a publicly known film made of, for example, a polyester such aspolyethylene terephthalate or polyethylene naphthalte, a polyolefin,cellulose triacetate, polycarbonate, polyamide, polyimide,polyamideimide, polysulfone, polyaramide, an aromatic polyamide orpolybenzoxazole. It is preferable to use a support having a highstrength such as polyethylene naphthalte or polyamide. If required, itis also possible to use a layered support as disclosed by JP-A-3-224127to thereby differentiate the surface roughnesses of the magnetic faceand the nonmagnetic support face. Such a support may be subjected to apretreatment such as corona discharge, plasma treatment, adhesionfacilitation, heating or dedusting. It is also possible to use analuminum or glass plate as the support of the invention.

Among all, a polyester support (hereinafter called merely polyester) ispreferred. This is a polyester made up of a dicarboxylic acid and a diolsuch as polyethylene terephthalate or polyethylene naphthalate.

Examples of the dicarboxylic acid component serving as a mainconstituent include terephthalic acid, isophthalic acid, phthalic acid,2,6-naphthalenedicarboxylic acid, 2,7-naphthalene dicarboxylic acid,diphenylsulfone dicarboxylic acid, diphenyl ether dicarboxylic acid,diphenylethane dicarboxylic acid, cyclohexane dicarboxylic acid,diphenyl dicarboxylic acid, diphenyl thioether dicarboxylic acid,diphenyl ketone dicarboxylic acid, phenylindane dicarboxylic acid and soon.

Examples of the diol component include ethylene glycol, propyleneglycol, tetramethylene glycol, cyclohexane dimethanol,2,2-bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)propane, 2,2-bis(4-hydroxyethoxyphenyl)propane,bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)sulfone, bisphenolfluorene dihydroxyethyl ether,diethylene glycol, neopentyl glycol, hydroquinone, cyclohexanediol andso on.

Among polyesters comprising these components as the main constituents,polyesters comprising, as the main constituents, terephthalic acidand/or 2,6-naphthalene dicarboxylic acid as the dicarboxylic acidcomponent and ethylene glycol and/or 1,4-cyclohexane dimethanol as thediol component are preferable from the viewpoints of transparency,mechanical strength, dimensional stability and so on.

In particular, a polyester comprising polyethylene terephthalate orpolyethylene-2,6-naphthalate as the main constituent, a copolymerpolyester comprising terephthalic acid, 2,6-naphthalene dicarboxylicacid and ethylene glycol and a polyester comprising a mixture of two ormore types of these polyesters as the main constituents are preferable.A polyester comprising polyethylene-2,6-naphthalte as the mainconstituent is particularly preferable.

The polyester to be used in the invention may be a biaxially stretchedpolyester or a laminate having two or more layers.

The polyester may be a copolymer having an additional copolymerizablecomponent or a mixture having another polyester. As examples thereof,the dicarboxylic acid components and the diol components described aboveand polyesters comprising the same can be cited.

To minimize delamination in film, it is possible in the polyester to beused in the invention to copolymerize an aromatic dicarboxylic acidhaving a sulfonate group or an ester-forming derivative thereof, adicarboxylic acid having a polyoxyalkylene group or an ester-formingderivative thereof, a diol having a polyoxyalkylene group, etc.

Considering the polymerization reactivity of the polyester and thetransparency of the film, it is particularly preferable to use 5-sodiumsulfoisophthalate, 2-sodium sulfoterephthalate, 4-sodium sulfophthalate,4-sodium sulfo-2,6-naphthalenedicarboxylate, compounds wherein sodium inthe above compounds are substituted by other metals (for example,potassium or lithium), an ammonium salt, a phosphonium salt or the likeor ester-forming derivatives thereof, polyethylene glycol,polytetramethylene glycol, polyethylene glycol-polypropylene glycolcopolymer and compounds wherein the hydroxyl groups at both ends of theabove compounds are oxidized into carboxyl groups. To copolymerize forthis purpose, it is preferable to use such a compound in an amount offrom 0.1 to 10% by mol based on the dicarboxylic acid constituting thepolyester.

In order to improve heat resistance, it is possible to copolymerize abisphenol compound or a compound having a naphthalene ring or acyclohexane ring. Such a compound is preferably copolymerized in anamount of from 1 to 20% by mol based on the dicarboxylic acidconstituting the polyester.

In the invention, the polyester can be synthesized in accordance with apublicly known method of producing a polyester without particularrestriction. For example, use can be made of the direct esterificationmethod which comprises subjecting the dicarboxylic acid component andthe diol component directly to an esterification reaction, or thetransesterification method which comprises first subjecting to a dialkylester employed as the dicarboxylic acid component and the diol componentto a transesterification reaction, then heating the reaction mixtureunder reduced pressure and thus removing the excessive diol component tothereby conduct polymerization. In this step, a transesterificationcatalyst or a polymerization may be used or a heat resistance stabilizermay be added, if needed.

Moreover, it is possible to add one or more additives selected fromamong, for example, a coloring inhibitor, an antioxidant, a crystalnucleating agent, a slippering agent, a stabilizer, an antiblockingagent, an ultraviolet light absorber, a viscosity-controlling agent, adefoaming/clarifying agent, an antistatic agent, a pH adjusting agent, adye, a pigment and a reaction-terminating agent in any step during thesynthesis.

It is also possible to add a filler to the polyester. Examples of thefiller include inorganic powders such as spherical silica, colloidalsilica, titanium oxide and alumina and organic fillers such ascrosslinked polystyrene and a silicone resin.

It is also possible to elevate the rigidity of the support bysuperstretching the material or forming a layer of a metal, a half metalor an oxide thereof on the surface of the support.

It is preferable that the thickness of the polyester to be used as thenonmagnetic support in the invention is from 3 to 80 μm, more preferablyfrom 3 to 50 μm and particularly preferably from 3 to 10 μm. It is alsopreferable that the average surface roughness (Ra) at the center of thesupport surface is 6 nm or less, more preferably 4 nm or less. This Rais measured by using a surface roughness meter (HD2000; manufactured byWYKO Co.).

The lengthwise and widthwise Young's modules of the nonmagnetic supportare preferably 6.0 GPa or above and more preferably 7.0 GPa or above.

In the magnetic recording medium of the invention, a magnetic layercontaining a ferromagnetic powder and a binder is formed at least oneface of the nonmagnetic support as described above. It is preferablethat a nonmagnetic layer (an under layer), which is substantiallynonmagnetic, is formed between the nonmagnetic support and the magneticlayer.

Magnetic Layer

It is preferable that the volume of the ferromagnetic powder containedin the magnetic layer is from 1000 to 20000 nm³, more preferably from2000 to 8000 nm³. By controlling the volume within the range asspecified above, worsening in the magnetic characteristics caused byheat fluctuation can be effectively prevented and, at the same time, afavorable C/N (S/N) can be obtained while sustaining low noise. As theferromagnetic powder, it is preferable to use a ferromagnetic metalpowder, a hexagonal ferrite powder or an iron nitride-based powder,though the invention is not restricted thereto.

The volume of an acicular powder is determined from the major axislength and the minor axis length on the assumption that the particlesare column-shaped.

The volume of a tabular powder is determined from the tabular diameterand the axis length (tabular thickness) on the assumption that theparticles are square column-shaped (hexagonal-shaped in the case of ahexagonal ferrite powder).

In the case of an iron nitride-based powder, the volume is determined onthe assumption that the particles are spherical.

The size of a magnetic material is determined as follows. First, aportion of an appropriate amount of the magnetic layer is stripped off.To 30 to 70 mg of the magnetic layer thus stripped, n-butylamine isadded and the mixture is sealed in a glass tube. Then, it is put in aheat decomposition apparatus and heated therein for about one day at140° C. After cooling, the contents are taken out from the glass tubeand divided into a liquid and a solid by centrifugation. The solid thusseparated is washed with acetone to give a powdery sample for TEM. Thissample is photographed under a scanning transmission electron microscope(H-9000; manufactured by Hitachi, Co.) at 100000× magnification. Then,it is printed on a photographic paper sheet at a total magnificationratio of 500000 to give a photograph of particles. In this photograph,the target magnetic material is selected and the outline of the particleis traced with a digitizer. Thus, 500 particles are measured with theuse of an image analysis software (KS-400; manufactured by Carl Zeiss).

The size of a powder such as a magnetic material as used herein(hereinafter referred to as “powder size”) has the following meaning.(1) In the case of an acicular, spindle-shaped or column-shaped (theheight being larger than the maximum diameter of the bottom face)powder, the powder size is expressed in the length of the major axisconstituting the powder, i.e., the major axis length. (2) In the case ofa tabular or column-shaped (the thickness to height being smaller thanthe maximum diameter of the bottom face) powder, the powder size isexpressed in the maximum major diameter of the tabular face or thebottom face. (3) In the case of a spherical, polyhedral orirregular-shaped powder in which the major axis constituting the powdercannot be specified from its shape, the powder size is expressed in theHeywood diameter that is determined by the circle projection method.

The average powder size of the powder is the arithmetic average of thepowder size as described above that is determined by the above-describedmeasurement method using 500 primary particles. The term “primaryparticles” means independent particles not undergoing aggregation.

The average acicular ratio of the powder means a value determined bymeasuring the length of the minor axis of each of the particles (i.e.,the minor axis length) in the above measurement and calculating thearithmetic average of the (major axis length/minor axis length) ratios.The term “minor axis length” is defined as follows: in the case (1) ofthe definition of the powder size as given above, it means the length ofthe minor axis constituting the powder; in the case (2) thereof, itmeans the thickness to height; and in the case (3) thereof wherein theminor axis cannot be distinguished from the major axis, the (major axislength/minor axis length) ratio is referred to as 1 for convenience.

When the powder has a definite shape (for example, in the case (1) ofthe definition of the powder size as given above), the average powdersize is referred to as the average major axis length. In the case (2)thereof, the average powder size is referred to as the average tabulardiameter, while the arithmetic average of the (maximumdiameter/thickness to height) ratio is referred to as the averagetabular ratio. In the case (3) thereof, the average powder size isreferred to as the average diameter (also called the average particlediameter or the average particle size). In measuring the powder size,(standard deviation/mean) expressed in percentage is defined as thecoefficient of variation.

<Ferromagnetic Metal Powder>

Although the ferromagnetic metal powder to be used in the magnetic layerof the magnetic recording medium of the invention is not particularlyrestricted so long as it contains Fe (including its alloy) as the maincomponent, a ferromagnetic alloy powder containing α-Fe as the maincomponent is preferable. In addition to the atom as specified above,this ferromagnetic powder may contain other atom(s) such as Al, Si, S,Sc, Ca, Ti, V, Cr, Cu, Y, Mo, Rh, Pd, Ag, Sn, Sb, Te, Ba, Ta, W, Re, Au,Hg, Pb, Bi, La, Ce, Pr, Nd, P, Co, Mn, Zn, Ni, Sr or B. It is preferablethat it contains at least one of Al, Si, Ca, Y, Ba, La, Nd, Co, Ni and B(more preferably, C, Al and/or Y) in addition to α-Fe. More specificallyspeaking, it is preferable that Co, Al and Y are contained respectivelyfrom 10 to 40% by atom, from 2 to 20% by atom and from 1 to 15% by atomeach based on Fe.

The ferromagnetic metal powder may be treated before the dispersion byusing a dispersant, a lubricant, a surfactant or an antistatic agent aswill be described hereinafter. Moreover, the ferromagnetic metal powdermay contain water, a hydroxide or an oxide in a small amount. It ispreferable that the water content of the ferromagnetic metal powder iscontrolled to 0.01 to 2%. It is preferable to optimize the water contentof the ferromagnetic metal powder depending on the kind of the binder.It is preferable that the pH value of the ferromagnetic metal powder isoptimized depending on the combination with the binder to be used.Namely, the pH value thereof usually ranges from 6 to 12, preferablyfrom 7 to 11. The ferromagnetic metal powder sometimes contain a solubleinorganic ion such as Na, Ca, Fe, Ni, Sr, NH₄, SO₄, Cl, NO₂ or NO₃,though it is essentially preferable that the ferromagnetic metal powderis free from any of them. However, the characteristics are neveraffected so long as the total amount of these ions is not more thanabout 300 ppm. In the ferromagnetic metal powder to be used in theinvention, a lower porosity is preferred. Thus, the porosity thereof ispreferably 20% by volume or less, more preferably 5% by volume or less.

The average major axis length of the ferromagnetic metal powder ispreferably from 20 to 100 nm, more preferably from 20 to 60 nm andparticularly preferably from 20 to 40 nm.

The crystalline size of the ferromagnetic metal powder is preferablyfrom 70 to 180 Å (angstrom), more preferably from 80 to 140 Å andparticularly preferably from 90 to 130 Å.

The crystalline size is the average determined from the half width ofdiffraction peak by the Scherrer method with the use of an X-raydiffractometer (RINT 2000 SERIES; manufactured by Rigaku Ltd.) using anX-ray source CuKα1, a tube voltage 50 kV and a tube current 300 mA.

The specific surface area by the BET method (S_(BET)) of theferromagnetic metal powder is preferably 45 to 120 m²/g, more preferablyfrom 50 to 100 m²/g.

In the case where the S_(BET) is less than 45 m²/g, noise is elevated.It is undesirable that S_(BET) exceeds 120 m²/g, since favorable surfacecharacteristics can be hardly obtained in this case. So long as S_(BET)falls within the range as defined above, both of favorable surfacecharacteristics and low noise can be established. It is preferable tocontrol the water content of the ferromagnetic metal powder to 0.01 to2%.

It is preferable to optimize the water content of the ferromagneticmetal powder depending on the kind of the binder. It is preferable tooptimize the pH value of the ferromagnetic metal powder depending on thekind of the binder and it ranges from 4 to 12, preferably from 6 to 10.

If necessary, the ferromagnetic powder may be made into Al, Si, P or anoxide thereof by surface-treating. The amount thereof is from 0.1 to 10%based on the ferromagnetic powder. It is preferable to conduct thesurface treatment, since the adsorption of a lubricant such as a fattyacid can be thus regulated to 100 mg/m² or less.

The ferromagnetic metal powder sometimes contain a soluble inorganic ionsuch as Na, Ca, Fe, Ni or Sr, though the characteristics are neveraffected so long as the total amount of these ions is not more thanabout 200 ppm. In the ferromagnetic metal powder to be used in theinvention, a lower porosity is preferred. Thus, the porosity thereof ispreferably 20% by volume or less, more preferably 5% by volume or less.

Concerning the shape of the ferromagnetic metal powder, it may be eitheracicula-shaped, grain-shaped, rice grain-shaped or tablet-shaped, solong as the particle volume fulfills the requirement as described above.It is particularly preferable to use a ferromagnetic powder of theacicular type. In the case of the acicula-shaped ferromagnetic metalpowder, the average acicular ratio is preferably from 4 to 12, morepreferably from 5 to 8. The antimagnetic force (Hc) of the ferromagneticmetal powder is preferably from 159.2 to 278.5 kA/m (from 2000 to 3500Oe), more preferably from 167.1 to 238.7 kA/m (from 2100 to 3000 Oe).The saturation magnetic flux density thereof is preferably from 150 to300 mT (from 1500 to 3000 G), more preferably from 160 to 290 mT. Thesaturation magnetization (σs) thereof is preferably from 90 to 140 Am²/kg (from 90 to 140 emu/g), more preferably from 100 to 120 A m²/kg. Asmaller SFD (switching field distribution) of the magnetic material perse is preferred. An SFD of 0.6 or less is suitable for high-densitydigital magnetic recording, since favorable electromagnetic conversioncharacteristics and a high output can be obtained and sharp magneticinversion and a small peak shift can be established in this case. Tonarrow the Hc distribution in the ferromagnetic metal powder, there havebeen proposed methods of improving geothite particle size distribution,using monodispersion αFe₂O₃, preventing interparticle sintering and soon.

As the ferromagnetic metal powder, use can be made of a product obtainedby a publicly known method. Examples of such a method include a methodin which moisture-containing iron oxide or iron oxide having beentreated with an antisintering agent is reduced by using a reductive gasto give Fe or Fe—Co particles, a method in which reduction is conductedwith the use of a complex organic acid salt (mainly an oxalic acid salt)and a reductive gas such as hydrogen, a method in which a metal carbonylcompound is thermally decomposed, a method in which an aqueous solutionof a ferromagnetic metal is reduced by adding an reducing agent such assodium borohydride, a hypophosphorous salt or hydrazine, a method inwhich a metal is vaporized in an inert gas under a low pressure tothereby give a powder, and so on. The ferromagnetic metal powder thusobtained is subjected to a publicly known deacidification treatment. Itis preferable to employ a method comprising reducing moisture-containingiron oxide or iron oxide by using a reductive gas such as hydrogen andforming an oxide film on the surface while controlling the partialpressures of an oxygen-containing gas and an inert gas, temperature andreaction time, since only small magnetic loss arises in this case.

<Ferromagnetic Hexagonal Ferrite Powder>

Examples of the ferromagnetic hexagonal ferrite powder includesubstituted barium ferrite, substituted strontium ferrite, substitutedlead ferrite and substituted calcium ferrite each optionally,cobalt-substituted and so on. More specifically speaking, examplesthereof include magnetoplanbite type barium ferrite, magnetoplanbitetype strontium ferrite, and magnetoplanbite type barium and strontiumferrites partially comprising a spinel phase. In addition to thepredetermined atoms, the ferromagnetic hexagonal ferrite powder maycontain Al, Si, S, Sc, Ca, Ti, V, Cr, Cu, Y, Mo, Rh, Pd, Ag, Sn, Sb, Te,Ba, Ta, W, Re, Au, Hg, Pb, Bi, La, Ce, Pr, Nd, P, Co, Mn, Zn, Ni, Sr, B,Ge, Nb, etc. In general, use can be made of a ferromagnetic hexagonalferrite powder comprising elements such as Co—Zn, Co—Ti, Co—Ti—Zr,Co—Ti—Zn, Ni—Ti—Zn, Nb—Zn—Co, Sb—Zn—Co, Nb—Zn and so on. Moreover, theferromagnetic hexagonal ferrite powder may contain impurities inherentto the material and/or production method employed. Preferable examplesof the additional atoms and the amount thereof are the same as in theferromagnetic metal powder as described above.

It is preferable that the particle size of the hexagonal ferrite powdersatisfies the volume as defined above. The average tabular diameterthereof is preferably 30 nm or less, more preferably from 10 to 25 nmand particularly preferably from 15 to 20 nm.

The average tabular ratio is from 1 to 15, preferably from 1 to 7. Solong as the average tabular ratio falls within the range of 1 to 15,sufficient orientation can be achieved while maintaining a high thepacking ratio in the magnetic layer and an increase in noise caused byantiparticle stacking can be prevented. The specific surface areadetermined by the BET method (S_(BET)) in the particle size range asspecified above is preferably 40 m²/g or above, more preferably from 40to 200 m²/g and most preferably from 60 to 100 m²/g.

In usual, a narrower tabular diameter and tabular thickness distributionof the hexagonal ferrite powder is preferred. The tabular diameter andthe tabular thickness can be numerically quantified by measuring 500particles selected at random in a TEM photograph of the particles andcomparing the data. Although the tabular diameter and tabular thicknessdistribution is not in normal distribution in many cases, the standarddeviation calculated on the basis of the mean (σ/mean) is from 0.1 to1.0. Attempts are made to sharpen the particle size distribution byhomogenizing the particle formation system as far as possible andtreating the thus formed particles to thereby improve the distribution.For example, there is known a method of selectively dissolving ultrafineparticles in an acid solution.

The antimagnetic force (Hc) of the hexagonal ferrite powder may beadjusted to from 143.3 to 318.5 kA/m (from 1800 to 4000 Oe), preferablyfrom 159.2 to 238.9 kA/m (from 2000 to 3000 Oe) and more preferably from191.0 to 214.9 kA/m (from 2200 to 2800 Oe).

The antimagnetic force (Hc) can be controlled depending on the particlesize (tabular diameter and tabular thickness), the kind and the amountof the element contained therein, the substitution site of the element,the conditions for the particle formation reaction and so on.

The saturation magnetization (as) of the hexagonal ferrite powder isfrom 30 to 80 A m²/kg (emu/g). Although a higher saturationmagnetization (σs) is preferred, the saturation magnetization (σs) isliable to lower with a decrease in the particle size. It is well knownthat the saturation magnetization (σs) can be improved by blendingmagnetoplanbite ferrite with spinel ferrite or appropriately selectingthe kind and the amount of the element contained therein. It is alsopossible to employ a W type hexagonal ferrite. In dispersing themagnetic material, it has been a practice to treat the surface ofmagnetic material particles with a substance compatible with thedispersion medium and the polymer. As the surface-treating agent, aninorganic compound or an organic compound may be used. Typical examplesthereof include oxides and hydroxides of Si, Al, P, etc., various silanecoupling agents and various titanium coupling agents. Thesurface-treating agent is added in an amount of from 0.1 to 10% by massbased on the mass of the magnetic material. (In this specification, massratio is equal to weight ratio). Also the pH value of the magneticmaterial is an important factor in the dispersion. Although the optimumpH value is usually in a range of from about 4 to about 12 depending onthe dispersion medium and the polymer, a pH value of from about 6 toabout 11 is selected by taking the chemical stability and preservationproperties of the medium into consideration. Furthermore, the moisturecontained in the magnetic material affects the dispersion. The watercontent is usually from 0.01 to 2.0%, though there is the optimum valuedepending on the dispersion medium and the polymer.

Examples of the method for producing the hexagonal ferrite powderinclude: (1) the glass crystallization method which comprises mixing andmelting barium oxide, iron oxide, a metal oxide for substituting iron,and a glass-forming substance such as boron oxide at such a ratio asgiving the desired ferrite composition, then quenching the mixture togive an amorphous product, heating it again and then washing andgrinding to thereby give a barium ferrite crystal powder; (2) thehygrothermal reaction method which comprises neutralizing a solution ofbarium ferrite composition metal salts with an alkali, removingby-products, heating the residue in a liquid phase at 100° C. or higher,and then washing, drying and grinding to thereby give a barium ferritecrystal powder; (3) the coprecipitation method which comprisesneutralizing a solution of barium ferrite composition metal salts withan alkali, removing by-products, treating the residue at 1100° C. orlower, and then grinding to thereby give a barium ferrite crystalpowder; and so on, though the invention is not restricted to any method.If required, the hexagonal ferrite powder may be surface-treated withAl, Si, P or an oxide thereof, etc. The amount of the surface-treatingagent is from 0.1 to 10% based on the ferromagnetic powder. It ispreferable to conduct the surface treatment, since the adsorption of alubricant such as a fatty acid can be thus regulated to 100 mg/m² orless. The ferromagnetic powder sometimes contain soluble inorganic ionssuch as Na, Ca, Fe, Ni and Sr. Although it is essentially preferablethat the ferromagnetic powder is free from such ions, thecharacteristics thereof are not affected where the content of these ionsis not more than 200 ppm.

Magnetic Iron Nitride Powder

In the case where a layer is formed on the surface of Fe₁₆N₂ particles,the average particle diameter of the Fe₁₆N₂ phase in magnetic ironnitride particles means individual Fe₁₆N₂ particles per se excluding thelayer.

Although the magnetic iron nitride particles contain at least the Fe₁₆N₂phase, it is preferably free from any other iron nitride phase. This isbecause the magnetic anisotropy of nitride crystals (Fe₄N or Fe₃N phase)is about 1×10⁵ erg/cc, while the Fe₁₆N₂ phase has a high crystalmagnetic anisotropy of 2 to 7×10⁶ erg/cc. Owing to this characteristic,the Fe₁₆N₂ phase can sustain a high magnetic force even in the state ofmicroparticles. This high crystal magnetic anisotropy can be establisheddue to the crystalline structure of the Fe₁₆N₂ phase. namely, Fe₁₆N₂crystals have a body-centered cubic structure wherein N atoms areregularly incorporated into the octahedral lattices of Fe. It isconsidered that the strain arising at the incorporation of the N atomsinto the lattices would result in the high crystal magnetic anisotropy.The magnetization easy axis of the Fe₁₆N₂ phase is the C axis extendedby nitriding.

It is preferable that the particles having the Fe₁₆N₂ phase aregrain-shaped or ellipse-shaped and spherical particles are morepreferable. Acicular particles are undesirable, since one of the threeequivalent directions of an α-Fe cubic crystal is selected by nitridingand serves as the C axis (i.e., the magnetization easy axis) and,therefore, acicula-shaped particles involve both of particles having themajor axis as the magnetization easy axis and particles having the minoraxis as magnetization easy axis. Accordingly, the average axis ratio(major axis length/minor axis length) is preferably 2 or less (forexample, from 1 to 2), more preferably 1.5 or less (for example, from 1to 1.5).

The particle diameter is determined based on the particle diameter ofiron particles before nitriding. A monodispersion is preferred, since amonodispersion generally suffers from lower medium noise. The particlediameter of a magnetic iron nitride-based powder having Fe₁₆N₂ as themain phase is determined based on the diameter of iron particles. It ispreferable that the particle diameter of the iron particles is amonodispersion. This is because the extent of nitriding differs betweenlarge particles and small particles and thus magnetic characteristicsare also different. From this point of view, it is also preferred thatthe particle diameter dispersion of the magnetic iron nitride-basedpowder is a monodispersion.

The particle diameter of the Fe₁₆N₂ phase, which is a magnetic material,is from 9 to 11 nm. At a smaller particle diameter, there arises aserious effect of heat fluctuation and the magnetic material becomessuperparamagnetic, which makes it unsuitable for a magnetic recordingmedium. In this case, furthermore, the magnetic coercive force iselevated due to magnetic viscosity in high-speed recording at a head,which makes recording difficult. At a larger particle diameter, on theother hand, saturation magnetization cannot be lessened and thus themagnetic coercive force in recording is elevated, which also makes therecording difficult. Furthermore, a larger particle diameter results inan increase in the particle noise in the magnetic recording mediumproduced therefrom. It is preferable that the particle diameterdispersion is a monodispersion, since a monodispersion generally suffersfrom lower medium noise. The coefficient of variation in the particlediameter is 15% or less (preferably from 2 to 15%), more preferably 10%or less (preferably from 2 to 10%).

It is preferable that the surface of the magnetic iron nitride-basedpowder having Fe₁₆N₂ as the main phase is coated with an oxide film,since Fe₁₆N₂ microparticles are liable to be oxidized and, therefore,should be handled in a nitrogen atmosphere.

It is preferable that the oxide film contains an element selected fromamong rare earth elements and/or silicon and aluminum. Thus, themagnetic iron nitride-based powder has similar particle surface as theexisting so-called metal particles comprising iron and Co as the maincomponents and, therefore, becomes highly compatible with the steps ofhandling these metal particles. As the rare earth element, use may bepreferably made of Y, La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, Tb, Dy and Gd. From theviewpoint of dispersibility, Y is particularly preferred.

In addition to silicon and aluminum, the magnetic iron nitride-basedpowder may further contain boron or phosphorus if needed. Furthermore,it may contain, as an effective element, carbon, calcium, magnesium,zirconium, barium, strontium and so on. By using such an elementtogether with the rare earth elements and/or silicon and aluminum, theshape-retention properties and the dispersion performance can beimproved.

In the composition of the surface compound layer, the total amount ofrare earth elements, boron, silicon, aluminum and phosphorus ispreferably from 0.1 to 40.0% by atom, more preferably from 1.0 to 30.0%by atom and more preferably from 3.0 to 25.0% by atom based on iron. Inthe case where these elements are contained in an excessively smallamount, the surface compound layer can be hardly formed and thus themagnetic anisotropy of the magnetic powder is lowered and the oxidationstability thereof is worsened. In the case there these elements arecontained too much, the saturation magnetization is frequently loweredin excess.

The thickness of the oxide film preferably ranges from 1 to 5 nm, morepreferably from 2 to 3 nm. When the thickness is smaller than the lowerlimit, the oxidation stability is frequently lowered. When it is largerthan the upper limit, on the other hand, it is sometimes observed thatthe particle size can be hardly reduced in practice.

Concerning the magnetic characteristics of the iron nitride-basedmagnetic particles having Fe₁₆N₂ as the main phase, the magneticcoercive force (Hc) thereof is preferably from 79.6 to 318.4 kA/m (from1,000 to 4,000 Oe), more preferably from 159.2 to 278.6 kA/m (from 2000to 3500 Oe) and more preferably from 197.5 to 237 kA/m (from 2500 to3000 Oe). This is because the effects by neighboring bits are enlargedat a lower Hc in in-plane recording, while recording becomes difficultin some cases at a higher Hc.

The saturation magnetization is preferably from 80 to 160 Am²/kg (from80 to 160 emu/g), more preferably from 80 to 120 Am²/kg (from 80 to 120emu/g). In the case where the saturation magnetization is too low, asignal becomes weak in some cases. When it is too high, on the otherhand, the effects on neighboring bits are enlarged in, for example,in-plane recording and thus the medium becomes unsuitable forhigh-density recording. The squareness ratio preferably ranges from 0.6to 0.9.

It is also preferable that the magnetic powder has a BET specificsurface area of from 40 to 100 m²/g. In the case where the BET specificsurface area is too small, the particle size becomes larger and thusserious particle noise arises in using a magnetic recording medium. Inthis case, moreover, the surface smoothness of the magnetic layer isworsened and thus the reproduction output is lowered in many cases. Inthe case where the BET specific surface area is too large, on the otherhand, the particles having the Fe₁₆N₂ phase are liable to aggregate. Asa result, it becomes difficult to obtain a homogeneous dispersion and,in its turn, a smooth surface can be hardly obtained.

As described above, the average particle diameter of the ironnitride-based powder is 30 nm or less, preferably from 5 to 25 nm andmore preferably from 10 to 20 nm.

To produce the iron nitride-based particles, use can be made of publiclyknown techniques, for example, a method disclosed by WO 2003/079332.

The magnetic particles produced by the above-described method can beappropriately used in a magnetic layer of magnetic recording media.Examples of the magnetic recording media include magnetic tapes such asvideo tapes and computer tapes, magnetic disks such as Floppy® disks andhard disks and so on.

Binder

To a binder, a lubricant, a dispersant, an additive, a solvent, adispersion method and so on to be used in the magnetic layer and thenonmagnetic layer of the magnetic recording medium according to theinvention, publicly known techniques for magnetic layers and nonmagneticlayers can be applied. In particular, publicly known techniques areapplicable to the amount of a binder and the kind thereof, the amount ofan additive or a dispersant to be added and the kind thereof.

Examples of the binder to be used in the invention include publiclyknown thermoplastic resins, thermosetting resins, reactive resins andmixture thereof. Examples of the thermoplastic resins include thosehaving a glass transition temperature of −100° to 150° C., anumber-average molecular weight of 1,000 to 200,000, preferably 10,000to 100,000, and a polymerization degree of about 50 to about 1,000.

Examples of such thermoplastic resins include polymers or copolymerscontaining as constituent units vinyl chloride, vinyl acetate, vinylalcohol, maleic acid, acrylic acid, acrylic ester, vinylidene chloride,acrylonitrile, methacrylic acid, methacrylic ester, styrene, butadiene,ethylene, vinyl butyral, vinyl acetal, vinyl ether, etc., polyurethaneresins, and various rubber resins. Examples of the d thermosettingresins or reactive resins include phenol resin, epoxy resin,polyurethane hardening resin, urea resin, melamine resin, alkyd resin,acrylic reactive resin, formaldehyde resin, silicone resin,epoxy-polyamide resin, a mixture of polyester resin and isocyanateprepolymer, a mixture of polyester polyol and polyisocyanate, and amixture of polyurethane and polyisocyanate. These resins are describedin detail in Purasuchikku Handobukku, Asakura Shoten. Further, knownelectron radiation curing resins can be incorporated in the individuallayers. Examples of these resins and methods of producing the same aredescribed in detail in JP-A-62-256219. The above-described resins can beused either singly or in combination. Preferred examples of such acombination of resins include a combination of at least one selectedfrom vinyl chloride resin, vinyl chloride-vinyl acetate copolymer, vinylchloride-vinyl acetate-vinyl alcohol copolymer and vinyl chloride-vinylacetate-maleic anhydride copolymer with a polyurethane resin, and acombination thereof with polyisocyanate.

Examples of the structure of polyurethane resins which can be used inthe present invention include known structures such as polyesterpolyurethane, polyether polyurethane, polyether polyester polyurethane,polycarbonate polyurethane, polyester polycarbonate polyurethane andpolycaprolactone polyurethane. To obtain better dispersibility anddurability, it is preferable to select, from among the binders citedherein, those into which at least one polar group selected from —COOM,—SO₃M, —OSO₃M, —P═O(OM)₂, —O—P═O(OM)₂ (in which M represents a hydrogenatom or alkaline metal salt group), —OH, —NR², —N⁺R³ (in which R is ahydrocarbon group), epoxy group, —SH, —CN, and the like has beenintroduced by copolymerization or addition reaction. The amount of sucha polar group is in the range of 10⁻¹ to 10⁻⁸ mol/g, preferably 10⁻² to10⁻⁶ mol/g.

Specific examples of these binders used in the present invention includeVAGH, VYHH, VMCH, VAGF, VAGD, VROH, VYES, VYNC, VMCC, XYHL, XYSG, PKHH,PKHJ, PKHC and PKFE (manufactured by Dow Chemical Co.), MPR-TA, MPR-TA5,MPR-TAL, MPR-TSN, MPR-TMF, MPR-TS, MPR-TM and MPR-TAO (manufactured byNisshin Chemical Industry, Co., Ltd.), 1000W, DX80, DX81, DX82, DX83 and100FD (manufactured by The Electro Chemical Industrial Co., Ltd.),MR-104, MR-105, MR110, MR100, MR555 and 400X-110A (manufactured by ZEONCorporation), Nippolan N2301, N2302 and N2304 (manufactured by NipponUrethane), T-5105, T-R3080, T-5201, Barnok D-400 and D-210-80, andCrisbon 6109 and 7209 (manufactured by Dainippon Ink And Chemicals,Incorporated), Vylon UR8200, UR8300, UR-8700, RV530 and RV280(manufactured Toyobo Co., Ltd.), Difelamine 4020, 5020, 5100, 5300,9020, 9022 and 7020 (manufactured by Dainichi Seika K.K.), MX5004(manufactured by Mitsubishi Chemical Industries Ltd.), Sanprene SP-150(manufactured by Sanyo Kasei K.K.), and Salan F310 and F210(manufactured by Asahi Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.).

The content of the binder to be contained in the nonmagnetic layer andthe magnetic layer of the present invention is normally in the range of5 to 50% by mass, preferably 10 to 30% by mass based on the nonmagneticpowder or the magnetic powder. In the case of using a vinyl chlorideresin, its content is preferably in the range of 5 to 30% by mass. Inthe case of using a polyurethane resin, its content is preferably in therange of 2 to 20% by mass. In the case of using a polyisocyanate, itscontent is preferably in the range of 2 to 20% by mass. These binderresins are preferably used in these amounts in combination. In the casewhere head corrosion arises due to a small amount of dechlorination, itis also possible to use polyurethane alone or a combination ofpolyurethane with isocyanate. In the case of using polyurethane in theinvention, its glass transition temperature ranges from −50° to 150° C.,preferably from 0° to 100° C., its breaking extension preferably rangefrom 100 to 2,000%, its breaking stress preferably ranges from 0.05 to10 kg/mm² (0.49 to 98 MPa) and its yield point e preferably ranges from0.05 to 10 kg/mm² (0.49 to 98 MPa).

Examples of polyisocyanates which can be used in the present inventioninclude isocyanates such as tolylene diisocyanate, 4-4′-diphenylmethanediisocyanate, hexamethylene diisocyanate, xylylene diisocyanate,naphthylene-1,5-diisocyanate, o-toluidine diisocyanate, isophoronediisocyanate and triphenylmethane triisocyanate, products of thereaction of these isocyanates with polyalcohols, and polyisocyanatesproduced by the condensation of isocyanates. Examples of the trade namesof these commercially available isocyanates include Colonate L, ColonateHL, Colonate 2030, Colonate 2031, Millionate MR and Millionate MTL(manufactured by Nippon Polyurethane Industry Co., Ltd.), TakenateD-102, Takenate D-110N, Takenate D-200 and Takenate D-202 (manufacturedby Takeda Chemical Industries, Ltd.), and Desmodur L, Desmodur IL,Desmodur N and Desmodur HL (manufactured by Sumitomo Bayer). Theseisocyanates may be used singly. Alternatively, by utilizing thedifference in hardening reactivity, two or more of these isocyanates canbe used in combination in both the individual layers.

The magnetic layer according to the invention may further containadditive(s), if needed. Examples of the additives include an abrasive, alubricant, a dispersant/dispersion aid, a mildewproofing agent, anantistatic agent, an antioxidative agent, a solvent, carbon black and soon. As these examples, use can be made of, for example, molybdenumdisulfide, tungsten disulfide, graphite, boron nitride, fluorinatedgraphite, silicone oil, silicone having a polar group, aliphaticacid-modified silicone, fluorine-containing silicone,fluorine-containing alcohol, fluorine-containing ester, polyolefin,polyglycol, polyphenyl ether, aromatic cycle-containing organicphosphonic groups such as phenylphosphonic acid, benzylphosphonic acid,phenethylphosphonic acid, α-methylbenzylphosphonic acid,1-methyl-1-phenethylphosphonic acid, diphenylmethylphosphonic acid,biphenylphosphonic acid, benzylphenylphosphonic acid, α-cumylphosphonicacid, tolylphosphonic acid, xylylphosphonic acid, ethylphenylphosphonicacid, cumenylphosphonic acid, propylphenylphosphonic acid,butylphenylphosphonic acid, heptylphenylphosphonic acid,octylphenylphosphonic acid and nonylphenylphosphonic acid and alkalimetal salts thereof, alkylphosphonic acids such as octylphosphonic acid,2-ethylhexylphosphonic acid, isooctylphosphonic acid, isononylphosphonicacid, isodecylphosphonic acid, isoundecylphosphonic acid,isododecylphosphonic acid, isohexadecylphosphonic acid,isooctadecylphosphonic acid and isoeicosylphosphonic acid and alkalimetal salts thereof, aromatic phosphoric acid esters such as phenylphosphate, benzyl phosphate, phenethyl phosphate, α-methylbenzylphosphate, 1-methyl-1-phenethyl phosphate, diphenylmethyl phosphate,biphenyl phosphate, benzylphenyl phosphate, α-cumyl phosphate, tolylphosphate, xylyl phosphate, ethylphenyl phosphate, cumenyl phosphate,propylphenyl phosphate, butylphenyl phosphate, heptylphenyl phosphate,octylphenyl phosphate and nonylphenyl phosphate and alkali metal saltsthereof, alkyl phosphoric acid esters such as octyl phosphate,2-ethylhexyl phosphate, isooctyl phosphate, isononyl phosphate, isodecylphosphate, isoundecyl phosphate, isododecyl phosphate, isohexadecylphosphate, isooctadecyl phosphate and isoeicosyl phosphate and alkalimetal salts thereof, alkyl sulfonates and alkali metal salts thereof,fluorinated alkyl sulfates and alkali metal salts thereof, monobasicfatty acids having from 10 to 24 carbon atoms (which may contain anunsaturated bond or may be branched) such as lauric acid, myristic acid,palmitic acid, stearic acid, behenic acid, butyl stearate, oleic acid,linoleic acid, linolenic acid, elaidic acid and erucic acid and alkalimetal salts thereof, monofatty acid esters, difatty acid esters ortrifatty acid esters of a monobasic aliphatic acid, which has 10 to 24carbon atoms, may contain an unsaturated bond and may be branched, withone of a mono- to hexavalent alcohol, which has 2 to 22 carbon atoms,may contain an unsaturated bond and may be branched, an alkoxy alcoholor a monoalkyl ether of an alkylene oxide polymer, which has 12 to 22carbon atoms, may contain an unsaturated bond and may be branched, suchas butyl stearate, octyl stearate, amyl stearate, isooctyl stearate,octyl myristate, butyl laurate, butoxyethyl stearate, anhydro sorbitanmonostearate, anhydro sorbitan tristearate and so on, fatty acid amideshaving 2 to 22 carbon atoms and aliphatic amines having 8 to 22 carbonatoms. In addition to the hydrocarbon groups cited above, use may bemade of those having an alkyl group, an aryl group or an aralkyl groupsubstituted by a group other than a hydrocarbon group, for example, anitro group or a halogenated hydrocarbon such as F, Cl, Br, CF₃, CCl₃ orCBr₃.

Further, use can be made of nonionic surfactants based on, for example,as alkylene oxide, glycerin, glycidol and alkylphenolethylene oxideaddition products; cationic surfactants such as cyclic amines, esteramides, quaternary ammonium salts, hydantoin derivatives, heterocycliccompounds, phosphoniums and sulfoniums; anionic surfactants containingacidic groups such as carboxylate, sulfonate and sulfuric ester;amphoteric surfactants such as amino acids, aminosulfonic acids,sulfuric or phosphoric esters of amino alcohols and alkylbetaines, etc.can be used. These surfactants are described in greater detail in KaimenKasseizai Binran, Sangyo Tosho K.K.

These lubricants, antistatic agents, etc. may not be necessarily 100%pure but may contain impurities such as an isomer, an unreactedmaterial, a by-product, a decomposition product and an oxide. Thecontent of these impurities is preferably 30% by mass or less, morepreferably 10% by mass or less.

Specific examples of these additives include NAA-102, castor hardenedaliphatic acid, NAA-42, Cation SA, Nymean L-201, Nonion E-208, Anon BFand Anon LG (manufactured by NOF Corporation), FAL-205 and FAL-123(manufactured by TAKEMOTO OIL & FAT Co.), Enujelb OL (manufactured byNew Japan Chemical Co., Ltd.), TA-3 (manufactured by The Shin-EtsuChemical Industry Co., Ltd.), Amide P (manufactured by Lion), DuomineTDO (manufactured by The Lion Fat and Oil Co., Ltd.), BA-41G(manufactured by The Nisshin Oillio Group, Ltd.), Profan 2012E, New PolePE61, Ionet MS-400 (manufactured by Sanyo Chemical Industries, Ltd.) andso on.

If necessary, a carbon black may be incorporated in the magnetic layerin the invention. Examples of the carbon black usable in the magneticlayer include furnace black for rubber, thermal black for rubber,acetylene black, and so on. The carbon black preferably has a specificsurface area of 5 to 500 m²/g, a DBP oil absorption of 10 to 400 ml/100g, a particle diameter of 5 to 300 nm, a pH value of 2 to 10, a watercontent of 0.1 to 10% and a tap density of 0.1 to 1 g/ml.

Specific examples of the carbon black employable in the presentinvention include BLACKPEARLS 2000, 1300, 1000, 900, 905, 800, 700 andVULCAN XC-72 (manufactured by Cabot Corp.), #80, #60, #55, #50 and #35(manufactured by Asahi Carbon Co., Ltd.), #2400B, #2300, #900, #1000,#30, #40 and #10B (manufactured by Mitsubishi Chemical Corp.), CONDUCTEXSC, RAVEN 1500, 50, 40, 15 and RAVEN-MT-P (manufactured by ColumbiaCarbon Corp.), and Ketchen Black EC (manufactured by Ketchen BlackInternational Co.). Such a carbon black may be surface-treated with adispersant, grafted with a resin or partially graphtized before using.Before adding to a magnetic coating, the carbon black may be dispersedby using a binder. Either a single carbon black or a combination thereofmay be used. In the case of using the carbon black, the amount thereofis preferably from 0.1 to 30% by mass based on the mass of the magneticmaterial. The carbon blacks have effects of, for example, preventing themagnetic layer from static electrification, lowering coefficient offriction, shading, and enhancing film strength. These effects vary fromcarbon black to carbon black. Accordingly, it is possible in themagnetic layer and the nonmagnetic layer of the invention to selectthese carbon blacks of appropriate kinds, amounts and combinations so asto establish the desired purpose depending on the properties asdiscussed above (i.e., particle size, oil absorption, electricalconductivity, pH, etc.). In other words, an optimum combination ofcarbon blacks should be selected for each layer. For the details of thecarbon black employable in the present invention, reference can be madeto Kabon Burakku Binrann, Carbon Black Kyokai.

As the abrasives to be used in the present invention, use can be made ofα-alumina having a percent alpha conversion of 90% or higher, β-alumina,silicon carbide, chromium oxide, cerium oxide, α-iron oxide, corundum,artificial diamond, silicon nitride, silicon carbide, titanium carbide,titanium oxide, silicon dioxide and boron nitride. In general, knownmaterials having a Mohs hardness of 6 or above can be used singly or incombination. Also, use may be made of a composite material made of theseabrasives (abrasive surface-treated with another abrasive) therefor.These abrasives sometimes contain compounds or elements other than themain component but similar effects can be established so far as thecontent of the main component is not less than 90%. The particle size ofthese abrasives is preferably in the range of 0.01 to 2 μm. To enhancethe electromagnetic conversion properties, a narrower particle sizedistribution is preferred. If necessary, a plurality of abrasives havingdifferent particle sizes may be used in combination to improvedurability. Alternatively, a similar effect can be established by usinga single abrasive having a wider particle diameter distribution. The tapdensity of these abrasives preferably ranges from 0.3 to 2 g/cc. Thewater content of these abrasives preferably ranges from 0.1 to 5%. ThepH value of these abrasives preferably ranges from 2 to 11. The specificsurface area of these abrasives preferably ranges from 1 to 30 m²/g.Although the abrasive to be used in the present invention may be in theform of aciculas, spheres, cubes or tablets, it is preferable to employan abrasive having edges partially on the surface thereof so as toestablish a high abrasion. Specific examples thereof include AKP-12,AKP-15, AKP-20, AKP-30, AKP-50, HIT-20, HIT-30, HIT-55, HIT-60, HIT-70,HIT-80 and HIT-100 (manufactured by Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd.),ERC-DBM, HP-DBM and HPS-DBM (manufactured by Reynolds InternationalInc.), WA10000 (manufactured by Fujimi Kenma K.K.), UB20 (manufacturedby Uemura Kogyo K.K.), G-5, Chromex U2 and Chromex U1 (manufactured byNippon Chemical Industrial Co., Ltd.), TF100 and TF140 (manufactured byToda Kogyo Co., Ltd.), beta-Random and Ultrafine (manufactured by IvidenCo., Ltd.) and B-3 (manufactured by Showa Mining Co., Ltd.). Theseabrasives may be added to the nonmagnetic layer, if necessary. By addingsuch an abrasive to the nonmagnetic layer, it is possible to control thesurface figure or prevent abrasives from protruding. Needless to say,the particle diameters and amounts of abrasives to be added to themagnetic layer and the nonmagnetic layer should be selectedindependently at optimal values.

In the invention, it is preferable to use diamond particles having anaverage diameter of 100 nm or less as an abrasive. The average diameteris preferably from 5 to 80 nm, more preferably from 10 to 50 nm. Byusing these diamond particles having an average diameter of 100 nm orless, the arithmetic average of phase difference according to theinvention can be easily established. Moreover, a medium excellent inhigh-density recording characteristics, run durability and head wear canbe thus provided. It is preferable to add the diamond particles in anamount of from 0.05 to 5% by mass, more preferably from 0.5 to 3% bymass, based on the ferromagnetic powder.

As the organic solvent to be used in the invention, use can be made ofpublicly known ones. Examples of the organic solvents which can be usedin the present invention include ketones such as acetone, methyl ethylketone, methyl isobutyl ketone, diisobutyl ketone, cyclohexanone,isophorone and tetrahydrofuran, alcohols such as methanol, ethanol,propanol, butanol, isobutyl alcohol, isopropyl alcohol and methylcyclohexanol, esters such as methyl acetate, butyl acetate, isobutylacetate, isopropyl acetate, ethyl lactate and glycol acetate, glycolethers such as glycol dimethyl ether, glycol monoethyl ether anddioxane, aromatic hydrocarbons such as benzene, toluene, xylene, cresoland chlorobenzene, chlorinated hydrocarbons such as methylene chloride,ethylene chloride, carbon tetrachloride, chloroform, ethylenechlorohydrin and dichlorobenzene, N,N-dimethylformamide, and hexane.These organic solvents may be used in any proportions.

These organic solvents are not necessarily 100% pure and may containimpurities such as isomers, unreacted matters, side reaction products,decomposition products, oxides and water besides main components. Thecontent of these impurities is preferably 30% or less, more preferably10% or less. In the present invention, it is preferable that the samekind of organic solvents are used in the magnetic layer and thenonmagnetic layer, though the amounts thereof may be different. Asolvent having a high surface tension (e.g., cyclohexanone, dioxane) maybe used for the nonmagnetic layer to enhance the coating stability.Specifically, it is desirable that the arithmetic mean of the solventcomposition for the upper layer is not smaller than that of the solventcomposition for the nonmagnetic layer. In order to enhance thedispersibility, it is preferable to employ an organic solvent having ahigh polarity. It is preferable that, in the solvent composition, asolvent having a dielectric constant of 15 or higher is contained in anamount of 50% or more. The solubility parameter of these solvents ispreferably from 8 to 11.

If necessary, the kinds and amounts of these dispersants, lubricants andsurface active agents to be used in the present invention may be variedbetween the magnetic layer and the nonmagnetic layer as will bediscussed hereinafter. For example, a dispersant would be bonded oradsorbed at a polar group. Thus, it is mainly adsorbed by or bonded tothe surface of the ferromagnetic metal powder in the magnetic layer andto the surface of the nonmagnetic powder in the nonmagnetic layer viathe polar group. It appears that an organophosphorus compound onceadsorbed is hardly detached from the surface of a metal or a metalcompound. In the invention, therefore, the ferromagnetic metal powdersurface or the nonmagnetic powder surface is in the state of beingcoated with an alkyl group, an aromatic group, etc., which improves theaffinity of the ferromagnetic metal powder or the nonmagnetic powder toa binder component. Moreover, the dispersion stability of theferromagnetic metal powder or the nonmagnetic powder is improvedthereby. On the other hand, a lubricant exists in the free state. Thus,it is possible to use fatty acids having different melting points in thenonmagnetic layer and the magnetic layer to thereby regulate the oozingthereof to the surface; to use esters having different boiling points orpolarities to thereby regulate the oozing thereof to the surface; tocontrol the amounts of surface active agents to thereby improve thecoating stability; and to use a lubricant in an increased amount in thenonmagnetic layer to thereby improve the lubricating effect. Theadditives to be used in the present invention may be entirely orpartially added at any steps during the process of producing the coatingsolutions for the magnetic layer or the nonmagnetic layer. For example,these additives may be with the ferromagnetic powder before kneading.Further, these additives may be added to the system at the step ofkneading the ferromagnetic powder with a binder and a solvent.Alternatively, these additives may be added to the system during orafter the dispersion step or immediately before the coating step.

Nonmagnetic Layer

Next, the nonmagnetic layer will be described in greater detail. Themagnetic recording medium according to the invention may have anonmagnetic layer containing a nonmagnetic powder and a binder on thenonmagnetic support. The nonmagnetic powder to be used in thenonmagnetic layer is either an inorganic material or an organicmaterial. It is also possible to use carbon black, etc. Examples of theinorganic material include a metal, a metal oxide, a metal carbonate, ametal sulfate, a metal nitride, a metal carbide, a metal sulfide and soon.

Specific examples thereof are selected from the following compounds andthey can be used either alone or in combination, e.g., titanium oxidesuch as titanium dioxide, cerium oxide, tin oxide, tungsten oxide, ZnO,ZrO₂, SiO₂, Cr₂O₃, α-alumina having an α-conversion rate of 90% to 100%,β-alumina, γ-alumina, α-iron oxide, goethite, corundum, silicon nitride,titanium carbide, magnesium oxide, boron nitride, molybdenum disulfide,copper oxide, MgCO₃, CaCO₃, SrCO₃, BaSO₄, silicon carbide and titaniumcarbide. Among all, α-iron oxide and titanium oxide are preferred.

The figure of nonmagnetic powder may be any of acicular, spherical,polyhedral and tabular shapes. The average crystalline size of thenonmagnetic powder is preferably from 4 nm to 500 nm, more preferablyfrom 40 to 100 nm. It is preferable that the crystalline size fallswithin the range of 4 nm to 500 nm, since an appropriate surfaceroughness can be achieved without interfering the dispersion. Theaverage particle diameter of these nonmagnetic powder is preferably from5 nm to 500 nm. A plurality of nonmagnetic powders each having adifferent particle diameter may be combined, if necessary, or a singlenonmagnetic powder having a broad particle diameter distribution may beemployed so as to attain the same effect as such a combination. Aparticularly preferred particle diameter of nonmagnetic powder is from10 to 200 nm. It is preferable that the average particle diameter of thenonmagnetic powders falls within the range of 5 nm to 500 nm, sincedispersion can be favorably conducted and an appropriate surfaceroughness can be obtained thereby.

The specific surface area of the nonmagnetic powder to be used in thepresent invention is from 1 to 150 m²/g, preferably from 20 to 120 m²/g,and more preferably from 50 to 100 m²/g. It is preferable that thespecific surface area falls within the range of 1 to 150 m²/g, since anappropriate surface roughness can be achieved and dispersion can be madeby using the binder in a desired amount in this case. The oil absorptionamount using DBP (dibutyl phthalate) thereof is from 5 to 100 ml/100 g,preferably from 10 to 80 ml/100 g, and more preferably from 20 to 60ml/100 g. The specific gravity there of is from 1 to 12, and preferablyfrom 3 to 6. The tap density of is from 0.05 to 2 g/ml, preferably from0.2 to 1.5 g/ml. So long as the tap density falls within the scope of0.05 to 2 g/ml, few particles scatter and thus the nonmagnetic powdercan be easily handled. Moreover, it scarcely sticks to a device in thiscase. The pH value of the nonmagnetic powder is preferably from 2 to 11,more preferably from 6 to 9. So long as the pH value falls within therange of 2 to 11, the coefficient of friction would not be elevated dueto high temperature, high humidity or leaving fatty acids. The watercontent of the nonmagnetic powder is from 0.1 to 5% by mass, preferablyfrom 0.2 to 3% by mass and more preferably from 0.3 to 1.5% by mass. Itis preferable that the water content falls within the range of 0.1 to 5%by mass, since favorable dispersion can be achieved and stable coatingviscosity can be obtained after the dispersion in this case. Theignition loss thereof is preferably 20% by mass or less and a smallerignition loss is preferred.

In the case where the nonmagnetic powder is an inorganic powder, theMohs' hardness thereof is preferably from 4 to 10. So long as the Mohs'hardness falls within the range of 4 to 10, a high durability can beensured. The stearic acid adsorption amount of the nonmagnetic powder isfrom 1 to 20 μmol/m², preferably from 2 to 15 μmol/m². The heat ofwetting of the nonmagnetic powder in water at 25° C. is preferably from200 to 600 erg/cm² (200 to 600 mJ/m²). Also, use can be made of asolvent having a heat of wetting within this range. The water moleculeamount on the surface at 100 to 400° C. is appropriately from 1 to 10molecules/100 Å. The isoelectric point thereof in water is preferablyfrom 3 to 9. It is preferable that the nonmagnetic powder issurface-coated so that there is Al₂O₃, SiO₂, TiO₂, ZrO₂, SnO₂, Sb₂O₃ orZnO. Al₂O₃, SiO₂, TiO₂ and ZrO₂ are particularly preferable and Al₂O₃,SiO₂ and ZrO₂ are more preferable. Either one of these compounds or acombination thereof may be used. Furthermore, use can be made of asurface treated layer formed by coprecipitation, if necessary.Alternatively, surface treatment of particles may be previouslyperformed with alumina in the first place, then the alumina-coatedsurface may be treated with silica, or vice versa. A surface treatedlayer may be porous, if necessary, thought a homogeneous and densesurface is generally preferred.

Specific examples of the nonmagnetic powder to be used in thenonmagnetic layer in the invention include Nanotite (manufactured byShowa Denko Co., Ltd.), HIT-100 and ZA-G1 (manufactured by SumitomoChemical Co., Ltd.), DPN-250, DPN-250BX, DPN-245, DPN-270BX, DPB-550BXand DPN-550RX (manufactured by Toda Kogyo Co., Ltd.), titanium oxideTTO-51B, TTO-55A, TTO-55B, TTO-55C, TTO-55S, TTO-55D, SN-100, MJ-7,α-iron oxide E270, E271 and E300 (manufactured by Ishihara Sangyo KaishaK.K.), STT-4D, STT-30D, STT-30 and STT-65C (manufactured by Titan KogyoCo., Ltd.), MT-100S, MT-100T, MT-150 W, MT-500B, MT-600B, T-100F andT-500HD (manufactured by Teika Co., Ltd.), FINEX-25, BF-1, BF-10, BF-20and ST-M (manufactured by Sakai Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.), DEFIC-Yand DEFIC-R (manufactured by Dowa Mining Co., Ltd.), AS2BM and TiO₂ P25(manufactured by Nippon Aerosil Co., Ltd.), and 100A, and 500A(manufactured by Ube Industries, Ltd.), Y-LOP (manufactured by TitanKogyo Co., Ltd.) and calcined products of them. Particularly preferrednonmagnetic powders are titanium dioxide and alpha-iron oxide.

By incorporating carbon blacks into the nonmagnetic layer, a desiredmicro Vickers' hardness can be obtained in addition to the effects ofreducing surface electrical resistance and light transmittance. Themicro vickers hardness of the nonmagnetic layer is usually from 25 to 60kg/mm² (245 to 588 MPa), preferably from 30 to 50 kg/mm² (294 to 490MPa) for improving the smoothness in the contact with the head. Themicro vickers hardness can be measured by using a thin film hardnesstester (Model HMA-400 manufactured by NEC Corp.). The tip of thepenetrator used is a triangular pyramid made of diamond with a tipsharpness of 80° and a tip radius of 0.1 μm. The measurement procedureis described in detail in Hakumaku no Rikigakuteki Tokusei HyoukaGijutu, Realize Corp. Concerning light transmittance, it is generallyspecified that the absorption of infrared rays of about 900 nm inwavelength is 3% or less. In the case of a VHS magnetic tape, forexample, the absorption thereof is standardized as 9.8% or less. Tosatisfy this requirement, use can be made of furnace black for rubber,thermal black for rubber, acetylene black, and so on.

The carbon black to be used in the nonmagnetic layer of the inventionpreferably has a specific surface area of 100 to 500 m²/g, morepreferably 150 to 400 m²/g, and an oil absorption of 20 to 400 ml/100 g,more preferably 30 to 200 ml/100 g as determined with DBP. The carbonblack has an average particle diameter of 5 to 80 nm, more preferably 10to 50 nm, particularly preferably 10 to 40 nm. The carbon blackpreferably has a pH value of 2 to 10, a water content of 0.1 to 10% anda tap density of 0.1 to 1 g/ml.

Specific examples of the carbon black that is usable in the nonmagneticlayer of the invention include BLACKPEARLS 2000, 1300, 1000, 900, 800,880 and 700, VULCAN XC-72 (manufactured by Cabot Corp.), #3050B, #3150B,#3250B, #3750B, #3950B, #950, #650B, #970B, #850B and MA-600(manufactured by Mitsubishi Kasei Corp.), CONDUCTEX SC, RAVEN 8800,8000, 7000, 5750, 5250, 3500, 2100, 2000, 1800, 1500, 1255 and 1250(manufactured by Columbia Carbon Corp.), and Ketchen Black EC(manufactured by Aczo Corp.).

These carbon blacks may be surface-treated with a dispersant, graftedwith a resin or partially graphtized before using. These carbon blacksmay be dispersed by using a binder before adding to the coating. Thesecarbon blacks may be used in an amount not exceeding 50% by mass basedon the mass of the foregoing inorganic powder or not exceeding 40% bymass based on the total mass of the nonmagnetic layer. These carbonblacks may be used singly or in combination. For the details of thecarbon black usable in the nonmagnetic layer of the present invention,reference can be made to Kabon Burakku Binran, edited by Kabon BurakkuKyokai.

Further, an organic powder may be added to the nonmagnetic layerdepending on the purpose. Examples of the organic powder include anacryl styrene-based resin powder, a benzoguanamine resin powder, amelamine-based resin powder and a phthalocyanine-based pigment. Use canbe also made of a polyolefin-based resin powder, a polyester-based resinpowder, a polyamide-based resin powder, a polyimide-based resin powder,and a polyfluoroethylene resin. To prepare these organic powders, usecan be made of a methods described in JP-A-62-18564 and JP-A-60-255827.

For the binder, lubricant, dispersant, and additives to be incorporatedin the nonmagnetic layer and the method for dispersing these componentsand solvents used therefor, those used for the magnetic layer can beemployed. In particular, for the amount and kind of the binder,additives and dispersant, the publicly known technique for the magneticlayer can be employed.

The magnetic recording medium according to the invention may be furtherprovided with an undercoating layer. By forming the undercoating layer,the adhesive force between the support and the magnetic layer or thenonmagnetic layer can be improved. As the undercoating layer, apolyester resin soluble in solvents may be employed.

Layer Constitution

Concerning the thickness constitution of the magnetic recording mediumof the present invention, the thickness of the nonmagnetic layer is from3 to 80 μm, preferably from 3 to 50 μm and particularly preferably from3 to 10 μm as discussed above. In the case where an undercoating layeris provided between the nonmagnetic support and the nonmagnetic layer,the thickness of the undercoating layer is from 0.01 to 0.8 μm,preferably from 0.02 to 0.6 μm.

The thickness of the magnetic layer can be optimally selected accordingto the saturation magnetization amount of the magnetic head used, thehead gap length, and the recording signal zone, and is preferably from10 to 150 nm, more preferably from 20 to 120 nm and more preferably from30 to 100 nm. The variation in the thickness of the magnetic layer ispreferably within ±50%, more preferably within ±30%. The magnetic layermay comprise at least one layer. It may comprise two or more layershaving different magnetic characteristics and well-known multilayermagnetic layer structures can be applied to the present invention.

The thickness of the nonmagnetic layer according to the presentinvention is generally from 0.1 to 3.0 μm, preferably from 0.3 to 2.0μm, and more preferably from 0.5 to 1.5 μm. The nonmagnetic layer in thepresent invention exhibits the effect of the present invention so longas it is substantially nonmagnetic even if, or intentionally, itcontains a small amount of a magnetic powder as an impurity, which is asa matter of course regarded as essentially the same construction as inthe present invention. The term “essentially the same” means that theresidual magnetic flux density of the nonmagnetic layer is 10 mT or lessor the antimagnetic force of the nonmagnetic layer is 7.96 kA/m (100Oe), preferably the residual magnetic flux density and the antimagneticforce are zero.

Back Layer

It is preferable that the magnetic recording medium of the invention hasa backcoat layer formed on the other face of the nonmagnetic support.The backcoat layer preferably contains carbon black and an inorganicpowder. As the binder and various additives to be added, theformulations for the magnetic layer and the nonmagnetic layer areapplicable. The thickness of the backcoat layer is preferably 0.9 μm orless, more preferably from 0.1 to 0.7 μm.

Production Method

The process for producing a coating composition for the magnetic layer,a coating composition for the nonmagnetic layer or a coating compositionfor the backcoat layer to be used in the present invention comprises atleast a kneading step, a dispersion step, and a mixing step which isoptionally provided before or after these steps. The steps for producinga coating composition for the magnetic layer or a coating compositionfor the nonmagnetic layer each may consist of two or more stages. All ofthe raw materials may be added to the system at the beginning or duringany step. It is also possible to add each of these raw materials inportions to the system at two or more steps. For example, polyurethanemay be supplied in portions into the system at the kneading step, thedispersion step or the mixing step for the viscosity adjustmentfollowing dispersion. In order to accomplish the objects of the presentinvention, use can be made of a publicly known production technique asone of the steps. To disperse a coating composition for the nonmagneticlayer or a coating composition for the backcoat layer, use can be madeof glass beads. As these glass beads, zirconia beads, titania beads andsteel beads which are dispersion media having a high specific gravityare preferably used. The particle diameter and packing ratio of thesedispersion media may be optimized before using. As a dispersion machine,a publicly known one may be used.

The production method according to the invention is characterized by themethod of preparing a coating composition for the magnetic layer. Thatis to say, the characteristic resides in that an arithmetic average ofphase difference, which is measured using a tapping mode AFM, of from 2to 20° is achieved by separately dispersing a magnetic solutioncontaining a ferromagnetic powder and a binder and an abrasive solutioncontaining an abrasive, then mixing the magnetic solution with theabrasive solution, and subjecting the liquid mixture thus obtained toboth of an air-bubbling treatment and an ultrasonication treatment.

The solid concentration of the coating composition for magnetic layer ispreferably from 5 to 25% by mass, more preferably from 5 to 15% by mass.At a high solid concentration, the interparticle distance is short andthus the air-bubbling becomes difficult. At a low solid concentration,on the other hand, air bubbles are liable to unite together and thus theair content of the liquid is lowered.

The abrasive solution usually contains an abrasive and an organicsolvent. The concentration of the abrasive in the abrasive solution ispreferably from 5 to 20% by mass.

In the invention wherein an abrasive having an average particle diameterof 100 nm or less is used, it is still preferable that the abrasiveconcentration is from 5 to 10% by mass.

At a high solid concentration, the interparticle distance is short andthus the air-bubbling becomes difficult. At a low solid concentration,on the other hand, air bubbles are liable to unite together and thus theair content of the liquid is lowered. In this case, moreover, ultrasonicwaves (puncture of cavities) strike particles under aggregation at onlya lowered possibility and thus circulation should be conducted at anelevated frequency, which worsens the productivity.

In the treatment of separately dispersing the magnetic solutioncontaining a ferromagnetic powder and a binder and the abrasive solutioncontaining an abrasive, a dispersion treatment using, for example, abead mill dispersion machine can be employed for dispersing the magneticsolution. In this step, an air-bubbling treatment may be conducted too.To disperse the abrasive solution, it is preferable to employ a firststep with the use of a batch type ultrasonic dispersion device and asecond step with the use of a circulation type ultrasonic dispersiondevice. These dispersion treatments are disclosed in JP-A-2005-228369.Anyway, it is desirable that the dispersion of the magnetic solution andthe abrasive solution is carried out to such an extent as surelydisintegrating the particle aggregates.

After mixing the magnetic solution with the abrasive solution, theliquid mixture thus obtained is subjected to an air-bubbling treatmentand an ultrasonication treatment. By the air-bubbling treatment,cavities should be sufficiently formed on the surface layer of themagnetic layer to be formed. This can be accomplished by, for example,using a high-speed stirrer having stirring blades such as a dissolverstirrer and stirring the mixture at a stirring blade peripheral speed of10 m/sec or higher for 5 minutes or longer. It is preferable that theproduct (Vt: m/sec×sec) of stirring blade peripheral speed (V) andstirring time (t) ranges from 3000 to 30000 (m). At a smaller Vt, littleair-bubbling occurs and, in its turn, a sufficient effect cannot beachieved. When Vt exceeds the upper limit as specified above, on theother hand, the air content cannot be elevated any longer within acertain treatment time and, therefore, the production efficiency islowered. Dispersion stability can be improved by setting the stirringblade peripheral speed at a higher level. Therefore, it is assumed thatthe air bubble size in the liquid is also reduced by combining theair-bubbling treatment with the ultrasonication treatment. It istherefore preferable to employ a stirring blade peripheral speed V offrom 10 to 50 m/sec. When the treatment is conducted at room temperatureunder atmospheric pressure, it is preferable to control the stirringtime so that the product Vt falls within the range as specified above.In the case of employing, for example, elevated pressure, Vt can beshortened. At a stirring blade peripheral speed of 20 m/sec or lower, itis possible to use a high-speed stirrer such as a dissolver stirrer or ahomogenizer. When the stirring blade peripheral speed exceeds 20 m/sec,it is preferable from the viewpoint of energy transfer to use ahigh-speed rotary thin layer stirrer (a fill mix).

Due to this stirring treatment, cavities can be sufficiently formed inthe surface layer of the magnetic layer to be formed. At the same time,the requirement for the range of the arithmetic average of phasedifference as specified in the invention can be satisfied thereby.

Although the ultrasonication treatment may be performed simultaneouslywith the stirring treatment, it is preferable to perform theultrasonication treatment after the completion of the stirringtreatment. As an ultrasonication apparatus, use can be made of apublicly known one. For example, it is possible to employ a flow typeultrasonic dispersion machine whereby ultrasonic waves are applied on aflowing fluid. The ultrasonication treatment is carried out preferablyunder, for example, the following conditions. Frequency: 15 to 20 kHz;amplitude: 20 to 60 μm; irradiation area: 36 to 50 mm in diameter;irradiation distance: 1 to 4 mm; retention time at irradiation volume(irradiation area×irradiation distance): 0.02 to 5 sec, more preferablyfrom 0.08 to 2 sec.

It is preferable to employ multiple liquid-feeding lines or acirculatory liquid-feeding line(s) in the flow type ultrasonicdispersion machine to thereby control the total retention time of theliquid passing through the irradiation volume within the range asspecified above.

When the retention time is shorter than the level as defined above, theeffect of disintegrating particles by the ultrasonic dispersion isworsened and particle size of additives (the abrasive and carbon black)becomes irregular at the micron order. When the retention time is toolong, on the other hand, the phase difference as specified in theinvention (in particular, cavities formed by phase lag) can be hardlyachieved. It appears that this phenomenon is caused since cavitationarises in passing pipe(s), in addition to the cavitation during theultrasonic dispersion, and the charge states on the surface of theparticles of the abrasive, carbon black and so on are thus changed,thereby promoting the adsorption of the air by the powder surface. Withan increase in the flow rate, the ultrasonic irradiation time isshortened and, in its turn, an increase in the temperature of the liquidunder the treatment can be prevented. It is considered that this pointalso contributes to the incorporation of air into the liquid under thetreatment.

It is preferable in the invention to further disperse the carbon blackalone in the magnetic solution. More specifically speaking, it isdesirable that a carbon black solution containing from 5 to 30% by massof carbon black in an organic solvent is prepared. Then, it is dispersedusing a bead mill to disintegrate the aggregated particles. Thedispersion thus obtained is subjected to the air-bubbling treatmentfollowed by the ultrasonication treatment. It is preferable that thesolid concentration of carbon black is appropriately controlled withinthe range as specified above depending on the average particle diameterof the carbon black employed. Namely, the solid concentration of theliquid is lowered with a decrease in the particle diameter by taking theinterparticle distance into consideration. When the solid concentrationis less than the lower limit as specified above, however, air can behardly incorporated and the dispersion stability is worsened. When itexceeds the upper limit, on the other hand, it is sometimes observedthat the liquid shows an increase in viscosity during the bead milldispersion treatment or the procedure of adding carbon black to anorganic solvent using an ultrasonic dispersion machine provided withstirring blades and liquefying the same cannot be sufficiently carriedout.

The air-bubbling treatment and the ultrasonication treatment may beconducted under the conditions as described above. After the completionof the dispersion of carbon black, the magnetic solution and theabrasive solution are mixed with it. Subsequently, the liquid mixturethus obtained is subjected to both of the air-bubbling treatment and theultrasonication treatment as described above to thereby give a coatingsolution for magnetic layer.

It is considered that extremely fine bubbles (nanobubbles) can beincorporated into the coating solution for magnetic layer by using bothof the air-bubbling treatment and the ultrasonication treatment asdescribed above. It is also considered that the charge states on thepowder surface are changed by the ultrasonication treatment and thus thenanobubbles are adsorbed on the powder surface. Accordingly, it seemsthat the dispersion stability of the powder containing the ferromagneticpowder can be remarkably improved thereby. Moreover, it is consideredthat cavities (voids) in several ten nanosize are formed in theneighborhood of the surface layer of the magnetic layer by thesenanobubbles. By appropriately controlling the amount of these cavities(voids) in the surface layer of the magnetic layer, the cohesive forcecan be lowered and the run durability can be improved without worseningthe electromagnetic conversion characteristics. Furthermore, theexistence of these cavities (voids) might contribute to the improvementin shock resistance or the supply of a lubricant to the neighborhood ofthe surface layer of the magnetic layer.

Compared with the magnetic solution, the additive liquids (the abrasivesolution and the carbon black solution) suffer from changes in surfaceenergy due to the ultrasonication treatment. It is assumed that thisdifference in surface energy causes a phenomenon that these solutionscan be hardly mixed together at nanosize in the step of preparing theliquid mixture. It is considered that the coating solution for magneticlayer in this state might induce a phenomenon that the additives (theabrasive and the carbon black) migrate toward the air layer within ashort time due to the difference in surface energy in the formation ofthe coating film. By using this phenomenon, it becomes possible, forexample, to efficiently localize diamond particles of 100 nm or less inthe surface layer of the magnetic layer. Thus, a required abrasiveprojection height (for example, 10 to 20 nm) can be ensured even byadding the abrasive in a reduced amount or reducing the particle size ofthe abrasive by considering head wear. That is to say, a medium havingan excellent run durability can be produced thereby while preventinghead wear. Similarly, carbon black can be localized in the surface layerof the magnetic layer. Thus, a required carbon black projection height(for example, 15 to 25 nm) can be ensured even by adding the carbonblack in a reduced amount or reducing the particle size of the carbonblack. Thus, the contact between the abrasive and the carbon black canbe regulated and head wear can be further prevented. At the same time,the microprojection density is elevated and the run durability isimproved. Since reduction in the amount of the additives (the abrasiveand the carbon black) contributes to the improvement in packing ratio ofthe magnetic material, a medium capable of achieving both of a high rundurability and improved electromagnetic conversion characteristics canbe produced by controlling the amount of the cavities (voids) in thesurface layer of the magnetic layer. In the case where the projectionheights of the additives (the abrasive and the carbon black) areelevated by the production method according to the invention, it ispreferable to appropriately controlled them by conducting thecalendering treatment at a high temperature, a high pressure and a lowspeed.

In the method of producing the magnetic recording medium according tothe invention, a coating composition for the magnetic layer is appliedon the surface of the nonmagnetic support, which is kept running, insuch an amount as to give a desired film thickness to thereby form themagnetic layer. In this step, multiple coating compositions for magneticlayer may be simultaneously or successively applied. Also, a coatingcomposition for nonmagnetic layer and a coating solution for magneticlayer may be simultaneously or successively applied. Coating apparatusesusable for applying the coating composition for magnetic layer or thecoating composition for nonmagnetic layer as described above include anair doctor coater, a blade coater, a rod coater, an extrusion coater, anair knife coater, a squeeze coater, an impregnation coater, areverse-roll coater, a transfer roll coater, a gravure coater, a kisscoater, a cast coater, a spray coater, and spin coater. With respect tothese coating apparatuses, reference may be made, for example, toSaishin Kotingu Gijutsu, published by Sogo Gijutsu Center K.K. (May 31,1983).

In the case of a magnetic tape, the coating layer of the magnetic layercoating composition may be subjected to a magnetic orientation treatmentto the ferromagnetic powder contained in the coating layer of themagnetic layer coating composition with the use of a cobalt magnet or asolenoid. In the case of a disk, a sufficiently isotropic orientingproperty may be obtained without performing orientation using anorientation apparatus. However, it is preferable to employ a publiclyknown random orientation apparatus, where cobalt magnets are diagonallyand alternately located or an AC magnetic field is applied by asolenoid. As for the isotropic orientation, in the case of aferromagnetic metal fine powder, in-plane two dimensional randomorientation is generally preferred but three dimensional randomorientation may also be provided by incorporating a vertical component.Furthermore, vertical orientation may be provided using a well-knownmethod such as different pole and counter position magnet to haveisotropic magnetic characteristics in the circumferential direction. Inparticular, when high-density recording is performed, verticalorientation is preferred. Also, circumferential orientation may beprovided using spin coating.

The drying position of the coating is preferably controlled bycontrolling the temperature and amount of drying air and the coatingspeed. The coating speed is preferably from 20 m/min to 1000 m/min andthe temperature of drying air is preferably 60° C. or higher.Furthermore, preliminary drying may also be appropriately performedbefore entering the magnet zone.

The coated master roll thus obtained is once wound using a winding rolland then unwound from the winding roll followed by a calenderingtreatment.

In the calendering treatment, for example, a supercalender roll can beused. By performing the calendering treatment, the surface smoothness isimproved, holes formed due to the removal of the solvent at the dryingdisappear and the packing ratio of ferromagnetic powder in the magneticlayer is elevated. As a result, the obtained magnetic recording mediumcan have high electromagnetic conversion characteristics. In thiscalendering step, it is preferable to perform the calendering treatmentwhile altering the conditions depending on the surface smoothness of thecoated master roll.

It is sometimes observed that the coated master roll shows a decrease inglossiness from the core side toward the outside of the wound roll,which causes variation in qualities in the longitudinal direction. It isknown that glossiness correlates (being proportional) to surfaceroughness (Ra). When the calendering treatment conditions (for example,calender roll pressure) are not altered but maintained at a constantlevel during the calendering treatment step, therefore, nocountermeasure is taken against the difference in smoothness in thelongitudinal direction that is caused by winding the coated master roll.In its turn, the final product also suffers from the variation inqualities in the longitudinal direction.

In the calendering treatment step, therefore, it is preferable to alterthe calendering treatment conditions (for example, calender rollpressure) to thereby compensate for the difference in smoothness in thelongitudinal direction that is caused by winding the coated master roll.More specifically speaking, it is preferred that the calender rollpressure is lowered from the core side toward the outside of the coatedmaster roll having been unwound from the winding roll. According to theinventors' studies, it is found out that the glossiness is lowered(i.e., the smoothness is lowered) by lowering the calender rollpressure. Thus, the difference in smoothness in the longitudinaldirection that is caused by winding the coated master roll can becompensated and a final product free from variation in qualities in thelongitudinal direction can be obtained.

Although the case where the calender roll pressure is altered isdescribed above, it is also possible to control the calender rolltemperature, the calender roll speed or the calender roll tension. Bytaking the characteristics of a coating vehicle into consideration, itis preferable to control the calender roll pressure or the calender rolltemperature. By lowering the calender roll pressure or lowering thecalender roll temperature, the surface smoothness of the final productis lowered. By elevating the calender roll pressure or elevating thecalender roll temperature, on the contrary, the surface smoothness ofthe final product is elevated.

Separately, heat curing can be promoted by thermally treating themagnetic recording medium obtained after the calendering treatment. Anappropriate thermal treatment may be determined depending on theformulation of a coating composition for magnetic layer. For example, itcan be performed at 35 to 100° C., preferably 50 to 80° C. The thermaltreatment is conducted for 12 to 72 hours, preferably 24 to 48 hours.

As the calender roll, use may be made of a thermostable plastic rollmade of epoxy, polyimide, polyamide, polyamideimide, etc. It is alsopossible to perform the treatment using a metallic roll.

The calendering treatment conditions to be employed for achieving such ahigh surface smoothness are as follows. Namely, the calender rolltemperature is controlled to from 60 to 100° C., preferably from 70 to100° C. and particularly preferably from 80 to 100° C.; the pressure iscontrolled to from 100 to 500 kg/cm (98 to 490 kN/m), preferably from200 to 450 kg/cm (196 to 441 kN/m) and particularly preferably from 300to 400 kg/cm (294 to 392 kN/m).

The magnetic layer in the magnetic recording medium according to theinvention has an average surface roughness (Ra) at the center of thesurface measured by using an atomic force microscope (AFM) of 2 nm orless, preferably from 0.5 to 1.5 nm. The maximum height (Rmax) (themaximum morphological displacement in a measurement area of 5 μm×5 μm)thereof is 50 nm or less, preferably from 10 to 50 nm. The averagesurface roughness (Ra) at the center of the surface and the maximumheight (Rmax) in the invention are defined in Examples. The ten pointaverage roughness (Rz) of the magnetic layer is preferably 30 nm orless. These factors can be easily controlled by controlling the surfaceproperties by fillers in the support or varying the surface shape ofrollers used in the calendering treatment. Curling is preferably withinthe range of ±3 mm.

The magnetic recording medium thus obtained can be cut into a desiredsize with a cutter, etc. before using. Although the cutter is notparticularly restricted, it is preferable to employ a cutter providedwith multiple pairs of a rotating upper blade (a male blade) and a lowerblade (a female blade) The slit speed, the engagement depth, theperipheral velocity ratio of the upper blade (male blade) to the lowerblade (female blade), the time of continuously using the slit blades,etc. may be appropriately selected.

Physical Properties

The saturation magnetic flux density of the magnetic layer of themagnetic recording medium according to the present invention ispreferably from 100 to 400 mT. The antimagnetic force (Hc) of themagnetic layer is preferably from 143.2 to 318.3 kA/m ((1800 to 4000Oe), more preferably from 159.2 to 278.5 kA/m (2000 to 3500 Oe).Antimagnetic force distribution is preferably narrow, and SFD and SFDrare preferably 0.6 or less, more preferably 0.3 or less.

The magnetic recording medium in the present invention has a frictioncoefficient against a head at temperature of from −10° C. to 40° C. andhumidity of from 0% to 95% of 0.50 or less, preferably 0.3 or less. Thesurface inherent resistivity of the magnetic surface thereof ispreferably from 10⁴ to 10⁸ Ω/sq. The charge potential thereof ispreferably from −500 V to +500 V. The elastic modulus at 0.5% elongationof the magnetic layer is preferably from 0.98 to 19.6 GPa (100 to 2000kg/mm²) in every direction of in-plane. The breaking strength thereof ispreferably from 98 to 686 MPa (10 to 70 kg/cm²). The elastic modulus ofthe magnetic recording medium is preferably from 0.98 to 14.7 GPa (100to 1500 kg/mm²) in every direction of in-plane. The residual elongationthereof is preferably 0.5% or less. The thermal shrinkage factor thereofat every temperature not exceeding 100° C. is preferably 1% or less,more preferably 0.5% or less, and most preferably 0.1% or less.

The glass transition temperature of the magnetic layer (the maximum ofloss tangent in dynamic viscoelasticity measurement at 110 Hz using adynamic viscoelastometer such as Rheovibron) is preferably from 50° C.to 180° C., and that of the nonmagnetic layer is preferably from 0° C.to 180° C. The loss elastic modulus is preferably within the range offrom 1×10⁷ to 8×10⁸ Pa (1×10⁸ to 8×10⁹ dyne/cm²), and loss tangent ispreferably 0.2 or less. If loss tangent is too great, adhesion failureis liable to occur. These thermal and mechanical characteristics arepreferably almost equal in every direction of in-plane of the mediumwithin difference of 10% or less.

The amount of the residual solvent in the magnetic layer is preferably100 mg/m² or less, more preferably 10 mg/m² or less. The cavity ratio ofeach coating layer is preferably 30% by volume or less, more preferably20% by volume or less, with both of the nonmagnetic layer and themagnetic layer. The cavity ratio is preferably smaller for obtaininghigh output but in some cases a specific value should be preferablysecured depending upon purposes. For example, in a disk-like mediumwhich is repeatedly used, for example, large cavity ratio contributes togood running durability in many cases.

In the magnetic recording medium according to the present invention,these physical properties of the nonmagnetic layer and the magneticlayer can be varied according to purposes. For example, the elasticmodulus of the magnetic layer is made higher to improve runningdurability and at the same time the elastic modulus of the nonmagneticlayer is made lower than that of the magnetic layer to improve the headtouching of the magnetic recording medium.

Method of Magnetic Record Reproduction

In the reproduction method of the magnetic recording medium according tothe invention, it is preferable to reproduce a signal magneticallyrecorded at a maximum linear recording density of 200 KFCI or more byusing a GMR head.

The intershield distance is from 0.08 μm to 0.18 μm and the reproductiontrack width is from 0.1 μm to 2.5 μm.

In the case where the magnetic recording medium of the invention is atape-shaped magnetic recording medium, even a signal recorded in ahigher frequency region compared with the conventional ones can bereproduced at a high S/N ratio by using a GMR head as a reproductionhead. Thus, the magnetic recording medium of the invention is highlysuitable for magnetic tapes and magnetic recording disks forhigh-density recording computer data.

EXAMPLES

Next, the present invention will be described in greater detail byreferring to the following Examples. It is to be understood that variouschanges in the components, proportions, operations, orders, etc. can bemade without departing from the spirit of the invention and theinvention is not construed as being restricted to the followingExamples. Unless otherwise noted, every “part” given in Examples is bymass.

Example 1

Coating solution for magnetic layer (Magnetic solution) Magnetic bariumferrite powder 100 parts (Hc: 2500 Oe (200 kA/m), average tabulardiameter: 20 nm) Sulfonate group-containing polyurethane resin 15 parts(SO₃Na group concentration 260 eq/t) Cyclohexanone 150 parts Methylethyl ketone 150 parts (Abrasive solution) Diamond powder 3 parts(Average particle diameter: 80 nm) Cyclohexanone 27 parts (Carbon blacksolution) Carbon black 0.5 part (Average particle diameter: 80 nm)Cyclohexanone 2 parts (Other components) Butyl stearate 1 part Stearicacid 1 part Polyisocyanate 2.5 parts (Colonate manufactured by NipponPolyurethane Industry Co., Ltd.) (Solvents for finishing) Cyclohexanone180 parts Methyl ethyl ketone 180 parts Coating solution for nonmagneticlayer Nonmagnetic inorganic powder: α-iron oxide 85 parts Average majoraxis length: 0.15 μm Average acicular ratio: 7 Specific BET surfacearea: 52 m²/g Carbon black 15 parts Average particle diameter: 20 nmVinyl chloride copolymer 13 parts (containing sulfonate group)Polyurethane resin 6 parts (containing sulfonate group) Phenylphosphonicacid 3 parts Cyclohexanone 140 parts Methyl ethyl ketone 170 parts Butylstearate 2 parts Stearic acid 1 part Polyisocyanate 5 parts (Colonatemanufactured by Nippon Polyurethane Industry Co., Ltd.) Coating solutionfor backcoat layer Nonmagnetic inorganic powder: α-iron oxide 80 partsAverage major axis length: 0.15 μm Average acicular ratio: 7 SpecificBET surface area: 52 m²/g Carbon black 20 parts Average particlediameter: 20 nm Carbon black 3 parts Average particle diameter: 100 nmVinyl chloride copolymer 13 parts Sulfonate group-containingpolyurethane resin 6 parts Phenylphosphonic acid 3 parts Cyclohexanone140 parts Methyl ethyl ketone 170 parts Stearic acid 3 partPolyisocyanate 5 parts (Colonate manufactured by Nippon PolyurethaneIndustry Co., Ltd.) Methyl ethyl ketone 400 parts

The magnetic solution was kneaded in an open kneader and diluted. Then,it was subjected to 8-pass dispersion in a horizontal bead milldispersion machine using Zr beads having a particle diameter of 0.5 mm(bead packing ratio: 80%, peripheral velocity of rotor: 10 m/sec, eachpass having retention time of 2 min). After the completion of the 8-passdispersion treatment, a 16-pass dispersion was performed using Zr beadshaving a particle diameter of 0.1 mm (bead packing ratio: 80%,peripheral velocity of rotor: 7 m/sec, each pass having retention timeof 2 min). For each of the dispersion passes, the material was receivedin a tank provided with a stirrer and dispersion was conducted whilebubbling air thereinto by stirring.

The carbon black solution was poured into a batch type ultrasonicdispersion machine provided with stirring blades (20 kHz, 600 W, 36 mmoscillator, 15 L tank×2, stirring blade diameter: 95 mm) to give asolution volume of 10 kg. Then it was liquefied by stirring at 1200 rpmfor 30 minutes. The carbon black solution thus liquefied was subjectedto 6-pass dispersion in a horizontal bead mill dispersion machine usingZr beads having a particle diameter of 0.5 mm (bead packing ratio: 80%,peripheral velocity of rotor: 10 m/sec, each pass having retention timeof 2 min). Next, this solution was stirred in a dissolver stirrer at aperipheral velocity of 10 m/sec for 30 minutes and subjected to 2-passdispersion in a flow type ultrasonic dispersion machine (US-1200;manufactured by NISSEI Corporation, 200 kHz, 1200 W, irradiation area:50 mm in diameter) at a flow rate of 3 kg/min.

The abrasive solution was poured into a batch type ultrasonic dispersionmachine provided with stirring blades (20 kHz, 600 W, 36 mm oscillator,15 L tank×2, stirring blade diameter: 95 mm) to give a solution volumeof 10 kg. Then it was liquefied by stirring at 1200 rpm for 30 minutes.The abrasive solution thus liquefied was subjected to 9-pass dispersionin a flow type ultrasonic dispersion machine (US-1200; manufactured byNISSEI Corporation, 200 kHz, 1200 W, irradiation area: 50 mm indiameter) at a flow rate of 0.3 kg/min. The abrasive thus ultrasonicatedwas once received in a tank and then filtered through a dead-end typefilter having an absolute accuracy of 1 μm.

The magnetic solution, the carbon black solution and the abrasivesolution were introduced together with other components (a lubricant anda curing agent) and the solvents for finishing into a dissolver stirrerand stirred at a stirring blade peripheral velocity of 10 m/sec for 30minutes. Next, the mixture was subjected to 1-pass dispersion in atriple flow type ultrasonic dispersion machine (US-1200, 20 KHz, 1200 W,irradiation area: 50 mm in diameter) at a flow rate of 7.5 kg/min. Next,it was filtered through a dead-end type filter having an absoluteaccuracy of 1 μm to thereby give a coating solution for magnetic layer.The coating solution for magnetic layer thus prepared was once allowedto stand at room temperature and poured as a batch into a tank providedwith a stirrer immediately before coating. Thus, the coating solutionwas supplied.

To prepare the coating solution for nonmagnetic layer, theabove-described components excluding the lubricant (butyl stearate andstearic acid) and polyisocyanate were kneaded in an open kneader anddiluted. Then, it was subjected to 8-pass dispersion in a horizontalbead mill dispersion machine using Zr beads having a particle diameterof 0.5 mm (bead packing ratio: 80%, peripheral velocity of rotor: 10m/sec, each pass having retention time of 6 min). After adding thelubricant (butyl stearate and stearic acid) and polyisocyanate, themixture was mixed and stirred in a dissolver stirrer at a peripheralvelocity of 10 m/sec for 30 min and then filtered through a dead-endtype filter having an absolute accuracy of 1 μm to thereby give thecoating solution for nonmagnetic layer.

To prepare the coating solution for backcoat layer, the above-describedcomponents excluding the lubricant (stearic acid), polyisocyanate andmethyl ethyl ketone (400 parts) were kneaded in an open kneader anddiluted. Then, it was subjected to 8-pass dispersion in a horizontalbead mill dispersion machine using Zr beads having a particle diameterof 1 mm (bead packing ratio: 80%, peripheral velocity of rotor: 10m/sec, each pass having retention time of 6 min). After adding thelubricant (stearic acid), polyisocyanate and methyl ethyl ketone (400parts), the mixture was mixed and stirred in a dissolver stirrer at aperipheral velocity of 10 m/sec for 30 min and then filtered through adead-end type filter having an absolute accuracy of 1 μm to thereby givethe coating solution for backcoat layer.

To a polyethylene phthalate support having a thickness of 6 μm, thecoating solution for nonmagnetic layer was applied and dried to give adry thickness of 1.5 μm. Next, the coating solution for magnetic layerwas applied thereon and dried to give a dry thickness of 0.08 μm. Whilethe magnetic layer was still in the moist state, orientation wasconducted in the vertical direction using a magnet of 0.10 T followed bydrying. After applying the coating solution for magnetic layer, thecoating solution for backcoat layer was applied on the opposite face ofthe support and dried to give a dry thickness of 0.5 μm. Next, theproduct was surface-smoothened by using a calender having metal rollsalone at a calendering speed of 100 m/min under a linear pressure of 300kg/cm (294 kN/m) at a temperature of 90° C. After curing, a thermaltreatment was conducted in a dry environment at 70° C. for 24 hours.After the completion of the thermal treatment, the tape was slit in ½in. width. The surface of the magnetic layer was cleaned with a tapecleaner that was attached to the apparatus for feeding and winding theslit product so that a nonwoven fabric and a razor blade were pressedagainst the magnetic face. Thus, a tape sample was obtained.

Using a multifunctional scanning probe microscope (SPM) (D3100;manufactured by Digital Instrument), the arithmetic average of phasedifference was measured under the following conditions.

Mode: tapping mode

Measurement area: 5 μm×5 μm

Tip: Diamond needle having curvature of 10 nm

Scan rate: 1 Hz

Scan angle: 0°

Tip speed: 10 μm/sec

Scan number: 512

Probe frequency: 265 to 269 Hz

Phase: 70°

Output: 1.3 to 2.4 V

Using the atomic force microscope (AFM) as described above, the averagesurface roughness (Ra) at the center of the surface and the maximumheight (Rmax) of the magnetic layer were measured.

Mode: AFM mode (contact mode)

Measurement area: 5 μm×5 μm

Tip: Diamond needle having curvature of 10 nm

Scan number: 512

The magnetic tape thus obtained was evaluated in run durability and headwear by the following methods.

Run durability: In an environment of 23° C. and 50%, the magnetic tapeof ½ in. in width was wrapped at 180° under a 100 g load in such amanner that the magnetic layer was in contact with an Altic member andthen subjected to 100-pass continuous sliding at a speed of 14 mm/sec.After the completion of the sliding, damages on the magnetic layer wereevaluated as follows. By observing the slid face at 4 positions under anoptical microscope at 50× magnification, a sample showing no damage (forexample, stripping of the magnetic layer, sliding scuff, etc.) wasevaluated as A; one showing at least one damage per filed (50×magnification) was evaluated as C; and one showing the intermediateconditions was evaluated as B.

Head wear: Using a marketed SDLT drive (SDLT320; manufactured byQuantum), a tape sample (length: 600 m) repeatedly run in an environmentat 23° C. and 50% for 600 hours.

The difference in height between the guard part and the MR head part wasmeasured under an atomic force microscope before and after the runningto determine the head wear. Head wear is expressed in a relative valuedetermined by regarding the value of Comparative Example 4 as to 1.

Example 2

The procedure of Example 1 was followed but using diamond particleshaving an average particle diameter of 50 nm.

Comparative Example 1

The procedure of Example 1 was followed but using diamond particleshaving an average particle diameter of 150 nm.

Comparative Example 2

A coating solution for magnetic layer having the same formulation as inExample 1 was used. The magnetic solution and the carbon black solutionwere kneaded to prepare a crude dispersion. Next, diamond particles wereadded as a powder. The resultant mixture was dispersed in a verticalbatch bead mill dispersion machine by using Zr beads having a particlediameter of 0.5 mm for a retention time of 720 min. Then, the lubricantand the curing agent were added as other components and the mixture wasfed into a dissolver stirrer and stirred at a stirring blade peripheralvelocity of 10 m/sec for 30 minutes. Subsequently, it was filteredthrough a dead-end type filter having an absolute accuracy of 1 μm tothereby give the coating solution for magnetic layer. Immediately beforethe application, the coating solution for magnetic layer prepared abovewas continuously stirred in a liquid-feeding tank at a stirring bladeperipheral velocity of 10 m/sec or higher. The subsequent treatmentswere the same as in Example 1.

Comparative Example 3

The procedure of Comparative Example 2 was followed but using no diamondparticle.

Comparative Example 3

The procedure of Example 1 was followed but using a ferromagnetic metalpowder (composition: Co/Fe=25 at %, Al/Fe=7 at %, Y/Fe=12 at %, averagemajor axis length: 0.45 μm, Hc: 191 kA/m, σs: 117 A m²/kg, S_(BET): 62m²/g, crystalline size: 110 Å, average acicular ratio: 5) as theferromagnetic powder in the coating solution for magnetic layer.

Table 1 summarizes the results.

TABLE 1 Average Amount Arithmetic diamond of average of particle diamondphase diameter added Ra Rmax difference Run (nm) (parts) (nm) (nm) (°)durability Head wear Example 1 80 3 1.2 28 5.0 A 2 Example 2 50 3 1.1 255.2 A 1 Comparative 150  3 1.4 63 9.5 A 10  Example 1 Comparative 80 31.5 39 1.8 C Unmeasurable Example 2 Comparative No No 1.4 20 1.0 CUnmeasurable Example 3 Comparative 80 3 2.5 60 4.5 B 1 Example 4

Table 1 indicates that the magnetic recording media of the invention,each having an arithmetic average of phase difference detected under anatomic force microscope in the tapping mode of 2 to 20°, were excellentin run durability and caused little head wear while sustainingultrasmooth surface.

According to the invention, it is possible to provide a magneticrecording medium of the coated type which has smooth surface properties,has small spacing between head and the medium, enables high-densityrecording, shows favorable running performance and causes little headwear, and a method of producing a magnetic recording medium whereby theabove-described characteristics can be established while achieving ahigh productivity.

The entire disclosure of each and every foreign patent application fromwhich the benefit of foreign priority has been claimed in the presentapplication is incorporated herein by reference, as if fully set forth.

1-3. (canceled)
 4. A method of producing a magnetic recording medium,the method comprising: separately dispersing a magnetic solutioncomprising a ferromagnetic powder and a binder, and an abrasive solutioncomprising an abrasive; then mixing the magnetic solution with theabrasive solution to give a coating solution for a magnetic layer; andapplying the coating solution on a nonmagnetic support to form amagnetic layer, wherein a liquid mixture obtained by mixing the magneticsolution with the abrasive solution is subjected to both of anair-bubbling treatment and an ultrasonication treatment.
 5. The methodaccording to claim 4, wherein the air-bubbling treatment is a treatmentthat is conducted by stirring with a high-speed stirrer having stirringblades at a stirring blade peripheral speed of 10 m/sec or higher for 5minutes or longer, and then the ultrasonication treatment is conducted.6. The method according to claim 4, which further comprises: dispersinga carbon black solution comprising a carbon black with a bead mill; thensubjecting the obtained dispersion to an air-bubbling treatment followedby an ultrasonication treatment; and then mixing the dispersion with themagnetic solution and the abrasive solution to thereby give a coatingsolution for a magnetic layer. 7-10. (canceled)